Matthias Lumala <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
: "Toady" <(E-Mail Removed)> a ?crit dans le message news:
:
(E-Mail Removed)...
: > On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 05:34:26 -0400, "SCW"
: > <YouDon'tNeedToE-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
: >
: > >I was talking to a compaq rep today on the phone and she told me that
: > >802.11b will be NO MORE by sometime next month? This is in reference to
: > >'hot spots' of course. Personally, I don't believe a word she said.
: > >
: > I have been in several stores lately looking at what they have
: > available. The salespeople seem to be pushing the 11b stuff. If I
: > say I'm more interested in 11g they say "what do you need that for?
: > It's overkill," or something like that. But 11g is only a few bucks
: > more and it includes both standards. I think they want to sell all of
: > the 11b stuff to suckers now at close to full price so they don't lose
: > money in a few months putting it out on clearance. And they know if
: > you buy 11b stuff now you'll be back within a year to upgrade.
: Not necessarily; If one use wifi mainly for internet access I don't see why
: they should upgrade given that good working wifi (>>1Mb) is faster than
: broadband (<1Mb).
: As long as the broadband bottleneck is not removed there is no point
: upgrading to higher wifi speeds.
: Of course if wireless is adopted in order to replace existing ethernet
: networks(file and printer sharing) then it's important to upgrade.
I can see 802.11g speeds being useful for doing things like backing up
a harddrive to a DVD-RW via your network. It will be a lot slower
with 802.11b.
Andrew
--
----> Portland, Oregon, USA <----
************************************************** *****************
---->
http://www.bizave.com <---- Photo Albums and Portland Info
----> To Email me remove "MYSHOES" from email address
************************************************** *****************