On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:06:08 -0600, Chris W <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>I am looking for recommendations for where to get good deals on
>connectors. Other than Times Microwave and Amphonol, I'm not sure what
>brands are high quality and will give the best performance when you are
>trying to get the most range out of your link. Hyperlink Technologies
>seem to have good prices but, I'm not sure if the Altelicon brand they
>sell are any good.
One of the demonstrations I like to give at radio club meetings is to
take all the coax cable adapters in my collection, place them in
series, install a watt-guesser at each end of the string, and connect
it all to a transmitter and dummy load. I then ask the audience to
guess how much loss 6ft of connectors is going to show on the
wattmeters. Also, the VSWR. I usually do this at 440Mhz, but have
also done it at 1.2Ghz. Unfortunately, I haven't done this test at
2.4GHz. According to the orthodox advice, adapters and connectors are
lossy. Wanna guess the loss through about 100 random coax adapters?
The answer is about the same as an equivalent length of RG-8/u coax
UHF or phono adapters). I don't worry much about connectors. It's
the coax cable that eats the power.
However, there's one thing that is missing in the above demonstration.
There's no consideration for the quality of the coax connector to coax
cable connection or crimp. This is where literally every single
connector failure I've seen occurs. Manually assembled, non-crimp
type connectors such as the common UG-21 N-connector are an invitation
to eventual failure. Wiggle it enough, and the braid just seperates
inside the connector resulting in a crappy connection. All my test
and production cables are crimped. So are all commercial patch cables
and pigtails. This is especially important in the smaller connectors
(smaller than SMA) where there's very little braid or foil to clamp in
the connector.
Another quality consideration is VSWR. Let's pretend I screw up and
use a 75 ohm cable and connectors instead of 50 ohms. That's not the
same as using a "low quality" connector, but is a fair simulation of
the results. The loss is actually LESS for a 75 ohm system than with
an equivalent length 50 ohm system, because the RF loss per foot at
2.4GHz for 75ohm coax is less.
http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/75_ohm_hardline.html
The mismatch loss for the 50 to 75 ohm transition (VSWR=1.5:1) is only
0.18dB. Translation: Don't worry about the alleged impedance "bump"
created by a "low quality" connector.
So, what consistitutes a useable "good" connector? Methinks (in
order):
1. Power handling capeability.
2. Corrosion and environmental resistance. Waterproof.
3. No dissimilar metals. Electrolysis prevention.
4. Crimping ability and quality.
5. Mechanical strength.
6. Decent electrical characteristics.
Details:
1. Power handling capeability.
We can ignore this at 2.4GHz unless your running high power with high
RF voltages.
2. Corrosion and environmental resistance. Waterproof.
3. No dissimilar metals. Electrolysis prevention.
These are the real killers. I've cleaned up a few products that were
a mixture of gold, silver, solder plate, zinc, and tin plated
connectors. Add water, salt, and a little DC and you'll shortly find
either corrosion or watch the plateing disappear. In extreme cases,
the mess forms a diode or battery causing RF problems. Whatever you
do, avoid incompatible materials.
4. Crimping ability and quality.
5. Mechanical strength.
That means the crimp joint is both mechanically and electrically
stable. It should be able to pass the pull, twist, and bend test
without falling apart. It should also be cosmetically reasonable. The
current trend is for the connectors to be minimalist and just
extensions of the coax cable. This makes sense, but also tends to
create flimsy connectors, especially the stamped connectors.
6. Decent electrical characteristics.
VSWR and loss. At 2.4GHz, this mostly consists of making sure that
there are no resonances introduced by the connector. The frequency
versus VSWR plots usually reveal any such problems.
So, who are the quality vendors? Well, that varies depending on what
you're trying to build. The list is huge because literally, there are
no "bad" vendors. AMP, Hirose, RF Industries, Amphenol, all make good
connectors. If you're doing CATV (75ohms), the vendor list expands
greatly. What is a problem is bad selection of connectors. SMA
connectors from multiple vendors are all standardized and almost
identical. Concentrate on the connector to coax connection (crimp)
and the rest will take care of itself. For example, the common CAT5
"hex" crimp connectors are really marginal, while the same F-connector
with a "push on" connector is both waterproof and mechanically
superior.
Try Electrocomm and download their latest catalog:
http://www.ecommwireless.com/catalogs.html
for cables and connectors. If you're building your own cables, plan
on spending some money on crimp tools. I probably have about $500
worth of coax crimp tools. The factory crimpers are expensive, but
the clones are now affordable:
http://www.fab-corp.com (under hand tools)
http://customer.manufacture.com.tw/~huau/p8.htm
(HT-301x series of crimpers)
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558