Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Cisco Wireless -N Home Router WRT120N

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Cisco Wireless -N Home Router WRT120N

 
 
R I G Consulting, Inc.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2011, 02:32 AM
Greetings,

Out of the box, I set up the WRT120N router per instructions from the
manual.

Problems:
1. I need to power-cyle the router every 24 hours for the devices to
identify the hotspot, if I don't, the wired router function is fine,
but wireless function is dead.
2. The "Network Magic" software can't see the DSL modem behing the
router (including the command line ping <modem-ip> won't respond) so
effectively the router has some factory defaults to block certain
ports from the LAN to the DSL modem. However the nodes on the LAN are
able to see the internet (HTML through traffic is fine, SMTP is fine
etc.)

Is this is a known issue with WRT120N? Any firmware upgrades are
suggested? How to change the factory defaults on the port
configurations? If it is easier to exchange for another model that
would be my take instead of upgrades. The manual is a bare-min setup
intructions and I am lazy to look them up online.
Any responses are appreciated.

TIA
The e-mail on the header is a spam filter; please e-mail
rigconsulting2@[nospam]yahoo.com for direct responses.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2011, 05:59 AM
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 19:32:48 -0800 (PST), "R I G Consulting, Inc."
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Greetings,
>
>Out of the box, I set up the WRT120N router per instructions from the
>manual.
>
>Problems:
>1. I need to power-cyle the router every 24 hours for the devices to
>identify the hotspot, if I don't, the wired router function is fine,
>but wireless function is dead.
>2. The "Network Magic" software can't see the DSL modem behing the
>router (including the command line ping <modem-ip> won't respond) so
>effectively the router has some factory defaults to block certain
>ports from the LAN to the DSL modem. However the nodes on the LAN are
>able to see the internet (HTML through traffic is fine, SMTP is fine
>etc.)
>
>Is this is a known issue with WRT120N? Any firmware upgrades are
>suggested? How to change the factory defaults on the port
>configurations? If it is easier to exchange for another model that
>would be my take instead of upgrades. The manual is a bare-min setup
>intructions and I am lazy to look them up online.
>Any responses are appreciated.


Try the latest firmware from Linksys. I got stuck with 2 of these at
remote mountaintop sites. Both would hang erratically and loose some
services, much the same as what you're seeing. Reducing the rather
large amount of port forwarding that was configured reduced, but not
eliminated the hangs. I keep them running with a clock timer, that
power cycles the routers twice a day. Yech(tm).

Another hint would be the crummy user ratings on various review sites.
The consensus is that it sucks:
<http://reviews.cnet.com/routers/linksys-wireless-n-home/4505-3319_7-33697852.html>
<http://www.zdnet.com/reviews/product/routers/linksys-wireless-n-home-router-wrt120n/33697852>
<http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/30900-linksys-cisco-wrt120n-reviewed>
<http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833124344>
NewEgg has 111 reviews, almost all of which say it's a terrible
router.


--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2011, 06:14 AM
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:59:49 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

(...)
><http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833124344>
>NewEgg has 111 reviews, almost all of which say it's a terrible
>router.


I noticed that one of the review on NewEgg mentioned that the WRT120N
is not "N" certified. That appears to be correct:
<http://certifications.wi-fi.org/pdf_certificate.php?cid=WFA7283>
<http://www.wi-fi.org/certified_products.php>



--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
R I G Consulting, Inc.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2011, 09:12 PM
I think I agree on the ratings...I might swap this for a Belkin
router, any suggestions on what would be good model with Belkin (or)
any other manufacturer model for that matter?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aside,

I did locate the cisco online support manual (their out of the box
manual is only an installation guide)
http://homesupport.cisco.com/en-us/wireless/lbc/WRT120N

Accessing the router web server at http://192.168.1.1 gives the config
page -- unlike the wired equivalent RT31P2 which I had earlier, this
router has some kind of soft switch for (PPoE) login into the modem
from the router which appears to be a new feature; contrast this with
prior models where once you logged on into the modem then connecting
the router inbetween the server and modem did not require you to learn
or change any settings on the router meaning that the factory defaults
on the modem just let the traffic thro unless you wanted to change
anything! The problem is, I do not know how to turn this feature off,
there is a Status | Login access to this feature on the router's web
onfig page, but it repeatedy fails. The ever first time I setup, I
used the desktop software "network magic" to connect, so effectively
this sw talks to the router to turn on the soft switch to allow
traffic. Now that I have direct access to the router config through
the web page, I thought I am better off, but even the original traffic
is not there now so I have to go back and setup the way I did from the
beginning out of the box.
And power cycle every 24 hrs!

TIA
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2011, 11:18 PM
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 14:12:41 -0800 (PST), "R I G Consulting, Inc."
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I think I agree on the ratings...I might swap this for a Belkin
>router, any suggestions on what would be good model with Belkin (or)
>any other manufacturer model for that matter?


I try not to recommend anything that I haven't tried myself. I have
only a little experience with Belkin. Mostly, their older stuff sucks
primarily because they don't bother doing updates to their firmware
beyond one or maybe two updates to the original release. If there are
bugs, they tend to be permanent. However, I will confess that I'm now
testing a Belkin F5D-8235-4 v2 router.
<http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833314041>
It won't do all the nifty and tricky stuff that DD-WRT will do, but is
good enough for my office use. Right now, it's moving a 7GB Mac DMG
file via wireless at about 25Mbits/sec. When I switch to 100baseT
ethernet on the target iMac G5, it speeds up slightly to about
30Mbits/sec. Not fabulous, but good enough for 2x2 MIMO. In all, it
seems like a tolerable router.

However, the reason I'm testing it is that my customer complained that
it stalls streaming HD video from his NAS box. I'm simulating his
setup and have not seen any such problems. Since he went to Costco
and bought a newer model Belkin something, I guess this one is now
mine.


>I did locate the cisco online support manual (their out of the box
>manual is only an installation guide)
>http://homesupport.cisco.com/en-us/wireless/lbc/WRT120N
>
>Accessing the router web server at http://192.168.1.1 gives the config
>page -- unlike the wired equivalent RT31P2 which I had earlier, this
>router has some kind of soft switch for (PPoE) login into the modem
>from the router which appears to be a new feature; contrast this with
>prior models where once you logged on into the modem then connecting
>the router inbetween the server and modem did not require you to learn
>or change any settings on the router meaning that the factory defaults
>on the modem just let the traffic thro unless you wanted to change
>anything!


The router does not "login" to the modem. I presume you have a DSL
modem. Since you're stuck with PPPoE, you have two choices. Setup
your PPPoE login in the modem, and setup the router for DHCP on the
WAN(internet) port. Or, you can setup the DSL modem for bridging, and
setup the PPPoE login in the router. Both work.

>The problem is, I do not know how to turn this feature off,


My problem is that you supplied everything except:
1. What you're trying to accomplish?
2. What you have to work with? (i.e. type of service, type of
connection (PPPoE, PPPoA, DHCP, etc, model of DSL or cable modem, etc.
3. What problem are you experiencing? I prefer to supply the right
way to do things, rather than try to determine what you might be doing
wrong.

>there is a Status | Login access to this feature on the router's web
>onfig page, but it repeatedy fails. The ever first time I setup, I
>used the desktop software "network magic" to connect, so effectively
>this sw talks to the router to turn on the soft switch to allow
>traffic.


Remove Network Magic. Products containing superlatives, such as
magic, miracle, amazing, ultimate, advanced, super, etc rarely are as
good as their name suggests. Network Magic tries to take control of
your connection. You can either set things up using Network Magic and
let it GUESS what type of system you're running, or you can get rid
Network Magic, and just follow the instructions on your ISP's web pile
or in the docs for the various devices. Doing both doesn't work.

>Now that I have direct access to the router config through
>the web page, I thought I am better off, but even the original traffic
>is not there now so I have to go back and setup the way I did from the
>beginning out of the box.


The router does not save your "original traffic" whatever that means.
I would not expect it to be there more than a few microseconds after
it is received.

>And power cycle every 24 hrs!


I would think that several hundred bad reviews would be sufficient to
convince you to abandon this router. Every company has its losers and
the Linksys WRT120N is certainly a problem.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com (E-Mail Removed)
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
 
Reply With Quote
 
R I G Consulting, Inc.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-09-2011, 02:10 AM
First off thanks for tuning in (into my problem), please read response
to
your question.

----------- start quote
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My problem is that you supplied everything except:
1. What you're trying to accomplish?
2. What you have to work with? (i.e. type of service, type of
connection (PPPoE, PPPoA, DHCP, etc, model of DSL or cable modem,
etc.
3. What problem are you experiencing? I prefer to supply the right
way to do things, rather than try to determine what you might be
doing
wrong.
----------- end quote
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Getting rid of wired LinkSys router RT31P2 to wireless-N (as you
had nailed it is no
N) WRT120N. Everthing else remains the same. The LAN is connected to
the router, router
to the DSL Modem westell wirespeed A90-210030-40 (if that matters). I
am moving to wireless
so the iPhone etc can use the hotspot.
2. PPPoE
3. Old setup that works: With the wired router RT31P2, there isn't
anything like the router
logging into the modem. The way I usually setup is (a) connect the
Desktop directly to the modem and
login into the ISP to test the ISP connection Logged-on & ON. When
this step is tested
(b) introduce the RT31P2 between the desktop(s) and
modem and connect all the desktops VoIP phone etc to the router. (c)
When required, for example,
incoming NetMeeting request from an associate, open the ports
NetMeeting on both the modem and router.
Or sometimes I just rid of the router and DMZ the IP for the main
desktop into the modem instead of hacking
my memory recalling port numbers. I keep the manuals for both, they
are REAL manuals and written WELL.

New Setup: However in WRT120N it appears the default is for the
router to login into
modem, somehow browsing through the web config I can't turn this
feature off. So I thought
this mandates re-login so supplied the credentials to login thru the
web config so I tried login
it keeps failing. [Note that the moden in already in a LOGGED IN state
and the DSL connection is
on] At this point I rid of the router and connect my desktop directly
to the modem and everything is
fine (to test). I agree I should rid of the "nw magic" sw supplied,
but the thing is, the sw mimics the
login thro the router it fails too, except if I startover (powercycle
router and follow the sw instruction) as if
out of box and it is fine. So everytime I rid of the router and DMZ
with the modem (for whatever reason)
and put the router back for getting other desktops and devices to the
internet, I have a problem, the
router does not connect to the DSL modem and no internet (LAN
operation is fine so the router's
switching is fine)

To sum it up the problem I am experiencing is (1) need to power-cycle
for the wireless to work every 24 hrs
(2) startover the setup whenever I rid of the router and put it back.
When I say startover, following the step by
step instruction as directed by the "nw magic" sw which I want to rid
off. The reason why I suspect it is
using some kind of "soft switch" to turn the router (Not the switch)
ON. I presumed this switch
to be the "login into the modem" mandated by the router web config,
but it may not be. Coz' when
go the web config on the router and login it always fails.

I just put my old RT31P2 back and everything a OK (of course I do not
have wireless) -- until I figure
a solution for this so I can use the wireless feature.

TIA
 
Reply With Quote
 
R I G Consulting, Inc.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-09-2011, 02:26 AM
Thanks for tuning in to the problem, answers below your question.

My problem is that you supplied everything except:
1. What you're trying to accomplish?
**** Moving from wired to wireless router. Everything else is the
same. Desktops
connected to router and router to DSL modem (westell wirespeed)
2. What you have to work with? (i.e. type of service, type of
connection (PPPoE, PPPoA, DHCP, etc, model of DSL or cable modem,
etc.
**** PPPoE
3. What problem are you experiencing? I prefer to supply the right
way to do things, rather than try to determine what you might be
doing
wrong.
***** with the old setup, whenever I rid of the router and put it
back, no re-login,
no change to anything. It works like magic -- not really magic, the
router
retains the config saved and restored -- even though power cycled.
***** with new setup 2 problems (1) need to power cycle every 24 hrs
for wireless to work (2) when ever I put the router back after
removing
it does not work, unless I start setup from the beginning using the
"nw magic" desktp
sw. I agree I need to rid of the sw, but it seems to turn on some soft
switch on the
router to connect to the modem (note the LAN switch function is ok,
just no access
to internet) I presumed this switch to be the " login to the modem"
feature on the router
but it is not, the login keeps failing when I try directly on the
router's web config.
This is frustrating since I want to rid of the sw.
 
Reply With Quote
 
miso
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-09-2011, 05:35 AM
I noticed Fry's is now selling Cisco branded routers in addition to
Linksys. As you know, Linksys sucked in the pre-Cisco days. Lots of
complaints on the net. After being owned by Cisco for a while, Linksys
seemed to be OK. Now you show they are selling junk again.

I can verify Linksys customer support is crap. You get the call center
in India and the responses are totally scripted. They won't look into my
router going into an unresponsive state when it gets too much wifi data.
Further, not only is there no new firmware update, but tech support told
me they will only provide new firmware to add a feature. There are no
bug fixes. To add insult to injury, they actually pulled the firmware
from their website, so if for some reason I needed to flash the router,
I'm SOL. The claim was a GPL violation existed in the firmware. Well
spend some freakin' money and get the rights to whatever was violated.

I hate Netgear. Their routers just out and out fizzle. D-Link seems to
be OK for a company that really doesn't design anything. It's all ODM,
just like Belkin, but they seem to have a decent ODM. [I'm only using
D-Link switches, not a wifi router.] A lot of Belkin gear has lifetime
warranties, which I've managed to use thanks to their crappy Chinese
OEM. I will admit Belkin sends you new shit to replace the broken shit,
only after you send them the defective item.

It may be to get a decent router these days, you have to buy the Cisco
branded gear. If the support on Cisco branded gear is in the US, I'd go
that route.

I haven't called D-Link in years, but in the day, their tech support
seemed to be domestic and competent.

In my call to Linksys tech support, it was suggested to first try a
different channel. I refused because that would mean setting up all my
wifi clients again. No amount of insisting I didn't have a comm issue on
the channel I picked would get me past step one on their script. I ran
kismet and knew all the signal strength of my neighbors and the channels
in use.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Char Jackson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-09-2011, 07:48 AM
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:35:05 -0800, miso <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I noticed Fry's is now selling Cisco branded routers in addition to
>Linksys. As you know, Linksys sucked in the pre-Cisco days. Lots of
>complaints on the net. After being owned by Cisco for a while, Linksys
>seemed to be OK. Now you show they are selling junk again.


I guess everyone has their own perspective, just like everyone loves a
certain brand of hard drive and considers all the rest junk. For me,
Linksys (pre-Cisco) was the best of the lot at that time. Netgear was
also fine, with D-Link solidly bringing up the rear. Other brands,
notably Belkin, didn't even rate a mention, in my book. As for Linksys
complaints on the net, I believe Linksys was by far the most popular
so it stands to reason they would have the most complaints. I'm sure
they also had the most satisfied users.

It's important to note a few things, as well. Every brand has its
stars and its clunkers, so it's not fair or correct to say a whole
brand name is junk. I'm guilty of that, too. Secondly, it can also
make a difference to separate the firmware from the hardware and
evaluate each on its own. If you can run 3rd party firmware such as
dd-wrt or Tomato or one of the other well-liked and well-known
flavors, then it doesn't much matter how bad the original firmware is
because you have an easy way to get around it.

>I can verify Linksys customer support is crap. You get the call center
>in India and the responses are totally scripted. They won't look into my
>router going into an unresponsive state when it gets too much wifi data.
>Further, not only is there no new firmware update, but tech support told
>me they will only provide new firmware to add a feature. There are no
>bug fixes. To add insult to injury, they actually pulled the firmware
>from their website, so if for some reason I needed to flash the router,
>I'm SOL. The claim was a GPL violation existed in the firmware. Well
>spend some freakin' money and get the rights to whatever was violated.


It's news to me that they no longer provide firmware on their website
or that they don't provide bug fixes, so I checked a random model, the
WRT54GL v1.1. While a quick glance didn't reveal multiple firmware
versions, the latest version was there and its release notes had a
fairly extensive list of bug fixes and nearly no new features. So much
for what they told you.
<http://homedownloads.cisco.com/downloads/WRT54GL_v4.30.15_FwReleaseNotes.txt>

>I hate Netgear. Their routers just out and out fizzle. D-Link seems to
>be OK for a company that really doesn't design anything. It's all ODM,
>just like Belkin, but they seem to have a decent ODM. [I'm only using
>D-Link switches, not a wifi router.] A lot of Belkin gear has lifetime
>warranties, which I've managed to use thanks to their crappy Chinese
>OEM. I will admit Belkin sends you new shit to replace the broken shit,
>only after you send them the defective item.


I have no experience with Belkin other than I've replaced a few dozen
Belkin routers with Linksys models over the years. Usually it was
because the Belkin had died, but more so lately it has been because
the customer wanted to go wireless.

>It may be to get a decent router these days, you have to buy the Cisco
>branded gear. If the support on Cisco branded gear is in the US, I'd go
>that route.
>
>I haven't called D-Link in years, but in the day, their tech support
>seemed to be domestic and competent.
>
>In my call to Linksys tech support, it was suggested to first try a
>different channel. I refused because that would mean setting up all my
>wifi clients again. No amount of insisting I didn't have a comm issue on
>the channel I picked would get me past step one on their script. I ran
>kismet and knew all the signal strength of my neighbors and the channels
>in use.


I don't see why changing channels on the router would mean squat to
the wireless clients. You don't get to specify the channel on the
client.

 
Reply With Quote
 
R I G Consulting, Inc.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-09-2011, 01:27 PM

I decided to call the LinkSys support eventually when I have
patience to deal with them, but meanwhile I decided D-Link for
backup instead of Belkin based on the above feedback. Any
suggestions on D-Link router models based on what I intend to
do (explained in the posts above?)

TIA
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WRT120n - negative reviews ps56k Wireless Internet 5 08-20-2010 08:17 PM
Cisco 1721 Router - Any Use in Home Network? TheScullster Broadband 3 03-02-2007 05:49 PM
Adding a wireless router to an existing network with Cisco router Michael Erb Wireless Internet 12 04-05-2006 01:26 AM
Is there a Cisco Router Available for Home Wireless? Chap Wireless Internet 14 02-01-2005 11:59 AM
SBC home portal, DI-624 Wireless Router, laptop home and office connection question. ja Wireless Internet 0 08-31-2004 04:43 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11