Phil wrote:
>>>>>I use a network using an 8 port hub and Cat5 cables. I've tried to add
>>>>>an extra machine to the network with a Cat5e cable but it isn't working
>>>>>- the new machine can't see the other machines and vice versa. Are Cat5
>>>>>and 5e compatible with each other - I thought 5e was just an enhanced
>>>>>version of Cat5... Or is it probably just a duff cable ?
>>>>
>>>>They're compatible.
>>>
>>>Thought as much, cheers.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Is it a store-bought cable?
>>>
>>>On-line purchase, but yea.
>>>Guess an exchange is on the cards... :/
>>
>>
>>Before sending it back, you might swap it with one of your known
>>good cables and see whether it works on a machine that's known
>>to be set up correctly
>
>
> Did that straight away. The results were strange... when substituting
> a known good machine with the suspect cable - the network failed to work
> on that machine. However, all the machines on the network did actually
> show at one point in Network Neighbourhood, but nothing was accessible
> (machine cannot be found on the network). Even the new machine (that I
> had actually bought the cable for) showed as well (even tho it wasn't
> connected anymore !).
>
That's an artifact of the way "Network Neighbourhood" works. It can
take quite a while for it to reflect changed circumstances.
>
>>there's a possibility of a software problem, too, unless you've already
>>ruled that out somehow.
>
>
> Given the problems when substituting for a known good cable/machine, I'm
> assuming software is not the problem.
>
Agreed. It sounds to me like the cable is defective.
>
>>And make sure you're not using an uplink port on the hub or something
>>easy to overlook like that
>
>
> Definetely not that, I've got 8 normal ports and 1 uplink clearly
> seperated.
>
OK. Every now and then one encounters somebody who hasn't read
the documentation, so I thought it best to ask. <g>
>
--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...@prodigy.net.
|