Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Network Hardware > Home Networking > Capacity of single cat5e cable

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Capacity of single cat5e cable

 
 
Clive
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-02-2005, 02:29 PM
I have 3 PC's upstairs, with my current 2mb cable modem also upstairs. The
PC's connect to the web via a 4 port switch.

I also have a file/print/email server (on 24/7) downstairs connect to the
same switch via a cat5e cable (solid core and fixed to walls, etc). Cable
length is about 20m max.

I'm switching to ADSL (4mb) and my phone socket is downstairs next to the
server, so I intend putting a ADSL router/switch downstairs. Will the cat5e
cable be able to cope with 3 PC's browsing and file transfer, etc. The
server is mainly used to store software and as a backup for the PC's (i.e.
on PC shutdown all 'my doc' is copied to server downstairs).

Or, should I move my switch downstairs and run another 3 cat5 cables
upstairs?

Thanks

Clive


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Andrew Oakley
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-02-2005, 02:37 PM
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:29:16 GMT, "Clive" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>server, so I intend putting a ADSL router/switch downstairs. Will the cat5e
>cable be able to cope with 3 PC's browsing and file transfer, etc. The


Yes, provided the switches are both 100 megabit at each end, and that
they actually recognise each other as 100 megabit.

I've frequently found kit, marked as 100 megabit, autosensing
incorrectly then downgrading a socket to 10 megabit for no adequately
explained reason. Since I buy cheap kit, I'm guessing that better kit
doesn't do this.

--
Andrew Oakley andrew/atsymbol/aoakley/stop/com
 
Reply With Quote
 
Phil Thompson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-02-2005, 02:51 PM
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:29:16 GMT, "Clive" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Will the cat5e
>cable be able to cope with 3 PC's browsing and file transfer, etc.


there's potentially only one Cat5 going into the modem, if that gives
you a clue

Even 10M ethernet will eat an ADSL connection and you probably have
100M on the Cat5. Not an issue, IMO.

Phil
--
spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
Come on down !
 
Reply With Quote
 
Martin Underwood
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-02-2005, 05:37 PM
"Clive" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:0JEne.43962$(E-Mail Removed). uk...
>I have 3 PC's upstairs, with my current 2mb cable modem also upstairs. The
>PC's connect to the web via a 4 port switch.
>
> I also have a file/print/email server (on 24/7) downstairs connect to the
> same switch via a cat5e cable (solid core and fixed to walls, etc). Cable
> length is about 20m max.
>
> I'm switching to ADSL (4mb) and my phone socket is downstairs next to the
> server, so I intend putting a ADSL router/switch downstairs. Will the
> cat5e cable be able to cope with 3 PC's browsing and file transfer, etc.
> The server is mainly used to store software and as a backup for the PC's
> (i.e. on PC shutdown all 'my doc' is copied to server downstairs).
>
> Or, should I move my switch downstairs and run another 3 cat5 cables
> upstairs?


I've only once come close to saturating a 100 Mbps LAN, and that was when I
was copying three separate directories from the same PC to three other PCs.
The network usage on the source PC then peaked at around 90%. Normally, even
between two modern-spec PCs with Win XP, a single directory copy only seems
to use about 30-40% flat-out.

The speed of the LAN is only an issue for PC-to-PC traffic. Any LAN (even 10
Mbps Ethernet or 11 Mbps Wireless-B) will be faster than a broadband
internet connection (almost certainly 2 Mbps max) so the broadband, rather
than the LAN, will be the rate-limiting step for internet traffic.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Clint Sharp
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-02-2005, 08:01 PM
In message <429f43d6$0$32411$(E-Mail Removed)>,
Martin Underwood <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>"Clive" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:0JEne.43962$(E-Mail Removed) .uk...
>>I have 3 PC's upstairs, with my current 2mb cable modem also upstairs. The
>>PC's connect to the web via a 4 port switch.
>>
>> I also have a file/print/email server (on 24/7) downstairs connect to the
>> same switch via a cat5e cable (solid core and fixed to walls, etc). Cable
>> length is about 20m max.
>>
>> I'm switching to ADSL (4mb) and my phone socket is downstairs next to the
>> server, so I intend putting a ADSL router/switch downstairs. Will the
>> cat5e cable be able to cope with 3 PC's browsing and file transfer, etc.
>> The server is mainly used to store software and as a backup for the PC's
>> (i.e. on PC shutdown all 'my doc' is copied to server downstairs).
>>
>> Or, should I move my switch downstairs and run another 3 cat5 cables
>> upstairs?

>
>I've only once come close to saturating a 100 Mbps LAN, and that was when I
>was copying three separate directories from the same PC to three other PCs.
>The network usage on the source PC then peaked at around 90%. Normally, even
>between two modern-spec PCs with Win XP, a single directory copy only seems
>to use about 30-40% flat-out.
>
>The speed of the LAN is only an issue for PC-to-PC traffic. Any LAN (even 10
>Mbps Ethernet or 11 Mbps Wireless-B) will be faster than a broadband
>internet connection (almost certainly 2 Mbps max) so the broadband, rather
>than the LAN, will be the rate-limiting step for internet traffic.
>
>

What he said, should cope perfectly well, but why not use one of the
spare pairs in the cat5 as a telephone extension and place the router
upstairs if you're concerned? Saves running extra cables etc and your
network bandwidth between the workstations and Server isn't touched.
--
Clint Sharp
 
Reply With Quote
 
poster
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-03-2005, 04:29 PM
On 2 Jun 2005 18:37, "Martin Underwood" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Any LAN (even 10 Mbps Ethernet or 11 Mbps Wireless-B) will be faster than
>a broadband internet connection (almost certainly 2 Mbps max) so the
>broadband, rather than the LAN, will be the rate-limiting step for
>internet traffic.


Given the 8000 kbps services from UK Online and Bulldog, being available to
some 4+ million people (probably the same 4 million for both services, in a
number of metro areas), I'd expect there to be some instances where a Wi-Fi
link which isn't performing at the full 11 Mpbs may slow things down when a
LAN is being used by several PCs (eg requesting traffic from several remote
servers, so total incoming traffic gets near the max ADSL speed possible).

--
UK ADSL <http://tinyurl.com/dghgq> - Happy to save cash with Plus.Net!
E-mail + files - 30 day free trial - <http://web.vfm-deals.com/runbox/>
USENET news service ? <http://tinyurl.com/3rjw4> (plans from under US$5)
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dean Jarratt
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-07-2005, 09:13 AM
Clint Sharp <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:(E-Mail Removed):

> What he said, should cope perfectly well, but why not use one of the
> spare pairs in the cat5 as a telephone extension and place the router
> upstairs if you're concerned? Saves running extra cables etc and your
> network bandwidth between the workstations and Server isn't touched.


Make sure you aren't running gigabit ethernet if your thinking of using the
spare pairs...because there are no spare pairs with gigabit.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dean Jarratt
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-07-2005, 09:18 AM
"Clive" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:0JEne.43962$(E-Mail Removed). uk:

To answer the subject..."capacity of single CAT-5 cable". CAT-5 bandwidth
is currently pushing 10-Gigabit full duplex mainly thanks to some nifty bit
encoding. That's what about 1.25 Gigabytes per second in both directions.
Given that a high spec RAID arrays can probably push around 350 Megabytes
per second, that makes CAT-5 useful for some years to come.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Can't I run two DSL lines in the same CAT5E cable?? Tom Wireless Internet 11 03-27-2008 02:39 AM
Which Cable Cat5e or Cat6??? G a z . Broadband 21 05-22-2007 04:48 PM
Cat5e cable recommendation rk Home Networking 6 02-01-2006 06:03 PM
Two connections on single UTP cable? SleeperMan Home Networking 13 09-27-2005 04:39 PM
Cat5e cable limits and runs Jeremy Davis Windows Networking 3 03-07-2004 10:21 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11