Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Cantenna Polarity Question

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Cantenna Polarity Question

 
 
whitton@atlantic.net
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-28-2005, 10:01 PM
Hi, I'm building a cantenna to extend the range of my Linksys WMP11
wifi card. I have determined that the WMP11 takes a RP-SMA connection,
and I just ordered a "LMR-195 Rev Polarity R/A SMA Male - N Male"
pigtail today. I know I'll need an N Female chasis mount connector to
recieve the N Male end of the pigtail for my cantenna, but I'm
wondering if the N Female connector needs to be reverse polarity as
well, or can it be just a regular old N Female connector? Any help
would be appreciated.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
dold@XReXXCante.usenet.us.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 12:29 AM
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> Hi, I'm building a cantenna to extend the range of my Linksys WMP11
> wifi card. I have determined that the WMP11 takes a RP-SMA connection,
> and I just ordered a "LMR-195 Rev Polarity R/A SMA Male - N Male"
> pigtail today. I know I'll need an N Female chasis mount connector to
> recieve the N Male end of the pigtail for my cantenna, but I'm
> wondering if the N Female connector needs to be reverse polarity as
> well, or can it be just a regular old N Female connector? Any help
> would be appreciated.


I find David Taylor's site to be well done.
http://www.nodomainname.co.uk/cantenna/cantenna.htm
Uh-oh. It doesn't seem to be available today.
http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/cantennahowto.html
Is the source of the design, and has some very clear pictures.


--
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5

 
Reply With Quote
 
David Taylor
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 03:25 AM
> I find David Taylor's site to be well done.
> http://www.nodomainname.co.uk/cantenna/cantenna.htm


Does now, maybe the host was rebooting their server, no can't be, it's
Linux now not NT, the salesman said it would *NEVER* need rebooting!

 
Reply With Quote
 
whitton@atlantic.net
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 04:03 AM
I appreciate the replies; however, I read the document and my question
still stands. I understand the procedure to build a cantenna, but I
just need to know if the N Female connector needs to be RP. I have a
suspicion that it doesn't. Maybe I'll try a regular connector first and
if it doesn't work go to RP. Thanks.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 04:35 AM
On 28 Jul 2005 21:03:27 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>I appreciate the replies; however, I read the document and my question
>still stands. I understand the procedure to build a cantenna, but I
>just need to know if the N Female connector needs to be RP. I have a
>suspicion that it doesn't. Maybe I'll try a regular connector first and
>if it doesn't work go to RP. Thanks.


Maybe if you understood the purpose of the reverse polarity
connectors, it might help.

The FCC had this bright idea of preventing people like yourself from
modifying unlicensed wireless hardware by requireing the manufacturers
to use uncommon and proprietary RF connectors on the radios. The
weird connectors were certainly uncommon 10 years ago, but have become
commonly available from numerous vendors. There was an attempt to
require even more proprietary connectors, but that proposal was
dropped by the FCC as being too expensive to impliment.

The result is that only the connector attached to the radio is reverse
polarized or weird. All the other connectors are conventional,
normal, non-weird, and commonly available. Same with test equipment,
dummy loads, patch cables, and adapters. The common pigtails and
adapters sold by various vendors are always reverse polarized on one
end and normal polarity on the other end.

When you build your can antenna, the panel or bulkhead mount "N"
connector on the antenna will be a normal polarity. So will the "N"
connector end of the pigtail. However, the other end will probably be
some reverse polarized connector to fit your WMP11 radio.

A cheezy way to avoid the hassle is to use a RP-SMA to N adapter at
the WMP11. See:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=5793385065
That makes all the connectors normal "N" connectors. One problem is
that the SMA adapter is very easy to break. If this is going into a
fixed location (i.e. rooftop), the adapter will work well. If it's
going to move around, such attached to a laptop, use a pigtail
instead. Another problem is that you still have to pay for the N
connectors on the cable ends so the adapter is just an added expense.





--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831.336.2558 voice http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
# http://802.11junk.com
# (E-Mail Removed)
# (E-Mail Removed) AE6KS
 
Reply With Quote
 
whitton@atlantic.net
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 02:11 PM
Exactly the response I was looking for. Thank you very much!

 
Reply With Quote
 
dold@XReXXCante.usenet.us.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 03:48 PM
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> I appreciate the replies; however, I read the document and my question
> still stands. I understand the procedure to build a cantenna, but I


I thought the pictures on the turnpoint page would help.
I meant to add the comment that I ordered my pigtail and matching N
connector at the same time.

Jeff pointed out that the "reverse" stuff is nonsense promulgated by the
FCC that is now largely abandoned, with lots of vendors using the same
connectors. Hawking antennas come with RP-SMA on the end of the cable, and
an RP-SMA to TNC adapter, covering a lot of the popular devices with two
connectors that theoretically were only available from the original
manufacturer for a particular device.

One remaining point is "male" verses "female", where the definition
definitely is in conflict from one connector-vendor website to another.

Fortunately, it doesn't matter much. The RP-SMA connector that you order,
whether called "male" or "female", only seems to come in one gender,
whichever that is.

On the "N" side, the terms are standardized, as are the connector
applications. N Female is usually at the devices, N Male on both ends of
the cable for normal use. There are no reversed N connectors, just
standard male and female. For your cantenna application, you got an
adapter cable long enough to go from your special connector to the N-Male
on the cantenna.

When I ordered mine, I only got 19", which is okay for hand held locating,
but isn't long enough for comfortable use. I still use that for locating
rogue WAPs at work, but nothing else.

Eventually, I went to a mini-USB dongle where cable length doesn't add RF
loss.

New Zealand uses mini-USBs in various parabolic reflectors.
http://www.usbwifi.orcon.net.nz/

Bob Alston's coffee can
http://members.cox.net/tulsaalstons/Computer.htm
Clarence Dold's coffee can
http://www.rahul.net/dold/clarence/u...42-800x600.jpg
I used the turnpoint calculator to decide where to poke the hole.
http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/cantennahowto.html
David Taylor's standard USB cantenna
http://www.nodomainname.co.uk/cantenna/cantenna.htm

--
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5

 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 05:26 PM
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:48:56 +0000 (UTC),
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>One remaining point is "male" verses "female", where the definition
>definitely is in conflict from one connector-vendor website to another.


Clue: The sex of the connector is NOT determined by the center pin.

Most connector vendors have givenup on the male and female
designation, which is often ambiguous. The current fashion is plug,
jack, and receptacle.

>Fortunately, it doesn't matter much. The RP-SMA connector that you order,
>whether called "male" or "female", only seems to come in one gender,
>whichever that is.


How about a reverse *THREAD* SMA connector?
| http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/con...?SKU=ASML-1714

>On the "N" side, the terms are standardized, as are the connector
>applications. N Female is usually at the devices, N Male on both ends of
>the cable for normal use. There are no reversed N connectors, just
>standard male and female.


Ditto. Reverse polarity "N" connectors:
| http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/con...ctors_rp_n.php
Reverse thread "N" conectors:
| http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/con...ctors_rt_n.php

Your nightmares may vary.


--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
dold@XReXXCante.usenet.us.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 06:00 PM
Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Clue: The sex of the connector is NOT determined by the center pin.


sez you! All I pointed out is that there are differing labels on the parts
on different vendor web sites.

> How about a reverse *THREAD* SMA connector?
> | http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/con...?SKU=ASML-1714


Okay, I give. What is the definition of that one?

>>On the "N" side, the terms are standardized, as are the connector
>>applications. N Female is usually at the devices, N Male on both ends of
>>the cable for normal use. There are no reversed N connectors, just
>>standard male and female.


> Ditto. Reverse polarity "N" connectors:
> | http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/con...ctors_rp_n.php
> Reverse thread "N" conectors:
> | http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/con...ctors_rt_n.php


That's sick. Why do those exist?

> Your nightmares may vary.


Nope. I have a consistent nightmare.

--
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5

 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-29-2005, 06:59 PM
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:00:51 +0000 (UTC),
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>sez you! All I pointed out is that there are differing labels on the parts
>on different vendor web sites.


No problem. I just wanted to muddy the waters a bit.

>Okay, I give. What is the definition of that one?


I dunno. Reverse threaded connectors are not very common. Actually,
I've never actually seen one on any type of equipment. In some cases,
it might be a good idea where reversing two connections might blow
something up.

>That's sick. Why do those exist?


Ummm.... entertainment value? Add to the confusion?
De-standardization? Product differentiation? Proprietarization?

Connector standards are a good thing. Every company should have one.

>> Your nightmares may vary.

>Nope. I have a consistent nightmare.


I'm always glad to be a part of someones nightmare.

Gone to fix a wine bottling machine. No RF required.


--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cantenna question sillyputty Wireless Internet 2 08-22-2007 05:00 PM
OT? BT line polarity? T i m Broadband 5 04-14-2005 08:23 PM
Cantenna construction question h0e Wireless Internet 0 12-27-2003 02:03 PM
Which polarity to use on long link? Rob Wireless Internet 3 11-04-2003 05:04 PM
Reverse Polarity SMA Adaptors Paul Wireless Internet 1 09-09-2003 07:55 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11