On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 01:15:20 -0400, Ogg wrote:
> Hello, N.!
> You wrote on Sun, 2 Apr 2006 21:12:09 -0700:
>> NM> OTOH, I wouldn't use Windows ICS if I could run a router, instead. A
>> NM> hardware box as a dedicated NAT device is much more elegant than a
>> NM> software kludge on a GP computer.
> I have dialup. ICS is the only option right now. I've worked it this way
> for almost 6 years now, no problem. I have a di-713p wireless router that
> supports a dialup modem, but the wired-ports don't work. I could
> theoretically get USB wireless adapters for each computer, but I really want
> my computers hardwire-networked.
So the router is broken? Ah, unfortunate. And probably out of the question
to buy a replacement. There are at least three models that I know of, from
D-Link, Netgear, and SMC, which support a dial-up modem.
> Thanks for your other suggestion regarding Browsemaster. I see that setting
> in WinME, no problem. Meanwhile I disabled it; it was previously on
> Automatic. At next boot up we will see what happens. Where might the
> equivalent to Browsemaster be on the XP pc?
I don't use Windows XP, but I believe it should similarly situated, within
the Properties for File and Printer sharing. In any case, I would expect
that disabling the Windows ME browsemaster may work. However, with the
Windows ME comptuer hosting the ICS connection, I have no experience to say
if that is so, or what.
If things are still broken, maybe setting the Windows ME browsemast to be
always on is a possibility, instead; while disabling it on the Windows XP
computer.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
|