Installation of the WINS server on your NT 4.0 machine is easy:
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/d...erver/proddocs
/en-us/rras40/rrasch04.mspx
This article will tell you more than you probably want to know about WINS:
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/d...erver/proddocs
/en-us/rras40/rrasch04.mspx
In your case all machines including the server should point to the server's
IP on the WINS tab in TCP/IP properties.
Doug Sherman
MCSE, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
"CarSalesman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:4F9DE443-5D89-4397-AEA2-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Please tell me where I can learn how to set up WINS. I've seen WINS info
in
> the networking properties, but never understood what it is all about.
>
> thank you,
>
> don
>
>
>
> "Doug Sherman [MVP]" wrote:
>
> > Browsing across WAN connections (including VPN) is frequently
problematic.
> > The conventional solution is WINS. However, if you are only interested
in
> > the shares on a server, why not simply use Start/Run \\NameorIPofServer
> > ENTER. If this works, you can create a shortcut on your desktop.
> >
> > Doug Sherman
> > MCSE, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
> >
> > "CarSalesman" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:3521CBC8-FDD8-4584-980F-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > I have a Windows NT Server at location A. We use a workgroup, no
domains.
> > > No problem with computers at location A, seeing and accessing the
server,
> > > using TCP/IP and Windows Networking.
> > >
> > > Have recently added location B. Two locations are connected by a VPN
> > > through the internet. VPN is done with routers.
> > >
> > > From location B, I can ping the server at location A, so I know the
VPN is
> > > working.
> > >
> > > Problem is that I can't browse the files on the server, from location
B.
> > I
> > > have verified the same workgroup, and subnet mask.
> > >
> > > The two locations do not have the same IP address sequence. Would
that be
> > > the problem? If so, would I fix it by adding another NIC on the
server,
> > > addressing it in location B's range? I have heard that running two
NICs
> > on
> > > NT Server did not work well. Is that true?
> >
> >
> >