Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Network Hardware > Home Networking > Building a router

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Building a router

 
 
Aosmosis
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 11:20 AM
After doing a clearout, I noticed I had enough bits to make a router PC.

PII 400Mhz,
Gigabyte motherboard,
64Mb RAM PC66
2x 10/100 LAN (3com and CNET)
1Mb ISA card, or 2mb PCI
Hard drives that I found spare:
CDROM drive 16x
250Mb, 1GB, 4.3Gb, 8GB

I would love to use the 250Mb hard drive in this setup.

For the setup, I would be using an ADSL PCI modem which has linux drivers.
The modem is made by www.amigo.com.tw

Then I would have a patch cable running to my wired/wireless switch, which
the other PCs on my network would use. I have 3 other PCs on the network,
one connects via a 25m patch cable, and the other 2 are wireless.

Reason being that I dont want to leave my main PC on all the time. I shoud
have bought a wired/wirless router with an ADSL modem built in, but I didnt
think of that.

Also probably would have been cheaper in the long term, Imagine how much
money I am paying by running a 400 watt PC. To be honest when the PC is idle
I'd probably say theres about 200W being consumed. I'd make a saving by
going for a built in adsl router, but I just want to dabble in a bit of
networking for now.

TIA





 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Martin Slaney
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 01:50 PM
Aosmosis wrote:
> After doing a clearout, I noticed I had enough bits to make a router PC.
>
> PII 400Mhz,
> Gigabyte motherboard,
> 64Mb RAM PC66
> 2x 10/100 LAN (3com and CNET)
> 1Mb ISA card, or 2mb PCI
> Hard drives that I found spare:
> CDROM drive 16x
> 250Mb, 1GB, 4.3Gb, 8GB
>
> I would love to use the 250Mb hard drive in this setup.
>
> For the setup, I would be using an ADSL PCI modem which has linux drivers.
> The modem is made by www.amigo.com.tw
>
> Then I would have a patch cable running to my wired/wireless switch, which
> the other PCs on my network would use. I have 3 other PCs on the network,
> one connects via a 25m patch cable, and the other 2 are wireless.
>
> Reason being that I dont want to leave my main PC on all the time. I shoud
> have bought a wired/wirless router with an ADSL modem built in, but I didnt
> think of that.
>
> Also probably would have been cheaper in the long term, Imagine how much
> money I am paying by running a 400 watt PC. To be honest when the PC is idle
> I'd probably say theres about 200W being consumed. I'd make a saving by
> going for a built in adsl router, but I just want to dabble in a bit of
> networking for now.
>
> TIA

^^^
Errr ... the above implies you meant to ask a question ...

--
...

I am not a marketing target ... I am a free man.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Aosmosis
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 02:14 PM

"Martin Slaney" <(E-Mail Removed)_SPAMpipex.com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Aosmosis wrote:
>> After doing a clearout, I noticed I had enough bits to make a router PC.
>>
>> PII 400Mhz,
>> Gigabyte motherboard,
>> 64Mb RAM PC66
>> 2x 10/100 LAN (3com and CNET)
>> 1Mb ISA card, or 2mb PCI
>> Hard drives that I found spare:
>> CDROM drive 16x
>> 250Mb, 1GB, 4.3Gb, 8GB
>>
>> I would love to use the 250Mb hard drive in this setup.
>>
>> For the setup, I would be using an ADSL PCI modem which has linux
>> drivers. The modem is made by www.amigo.com.tw
>>
>> Then I would have a patch cable running to my wired/wireless switch,
>> which the other PCs on my network would use. I have 3 other PCs on the
>> network, one connects via a 25m patch cable, and the other 2 are
>> wireless.
>>
>> Reason being that I dont want to leave my main PC on all the time. I
>> shoud have bought a wired/wirless router with an ADSL modem built in, but
>> I didnt think of that.
>>
>> Also probably would have been cheaper in the long term, Imagine how much
>> money I am paying by running a 400 watt PC. To be honest when the PC is
>> idle I'd probably say theres about 200W being consumed. I'd make a saving
>> by going for a built in adsl router, but I just want to dabble in a bit
>> of networking for now.
>>
>> TIA

> ^^^
> Errr ... the above implies you meant to ask a question ...
>
> --
> ..
>
> I am not a marketing target ... I am a free man.


LOL well noticed,

Does anyone know what linux distro would be the best for a complete novice?



 
Reply With Quote
 
Martin
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 02:35 PM
Aosmosis wrote:
> "Martin Slaney" <(E-Mail Removed)_SPAMpipex.com> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Aosmosis wrote:
>>> After doing a clearout, I noticed I had enough bits to make a
>>> router PC. PII 400Mhz,
>>> Gigabyte motherboard,
>>> 64Mb RAM PC66
>>> 2x 10/100 LAN (3com and CNET)
>>> 1Mb ISA card, or 2mb PCI
>>> Hard drives that I found spare:
>>> CDROM drive 16x
>>> 250Mb, 1GB, 4.3Gb, 8GB
>>>
>>> I would love to use the 250Mb hard drive in this setup.
>>>
>>> For the setup, I would be using an ADSL PCI modem which has linux
>>> drivers. The modem is made by www.amigo.com.tw
>>>
>>> Then I would have a patch cable running to my wired/wireless switch,
>>> which the other PCs on my network would use. I have 3 other PCs on
>>> the network, one connects via a 25m patch cable, and the other 2 are
>>> wireless.
>>>
>>> Reason being that I dont want to leave my main PC on all the time. I
>>> shoud have bought a wired/wirless router with an ADSL modem built
>>> in, but I didnt think of that.
>>>
>>> Also probably would have been cheaper in the long term, Imagine how
>>> much money I am paying by running a 400 watt PC. To be honest when
>>> the PC is idle I'd probably say theres about 200W being consumed.
>>> I'd make a saving by going for a built in adsl router, but I just
>>> want to dabble in a bit of networking for now.
>>>
>>> TIA

>> ^^^
>> Errr ... the above implies you meant to ask a question ...
>>
>> --
>> ..
>>
>> I am not a marketing target ... I am a free man.

>
> LOL well noticed,
>
> Does anyone know what linux distro would be the best for a complete
> novice?


I suggest you take a look at Mandrake 10.1 official. It comes with a choice
of Windows managers to choose from, so if the default KDE is too much for
your 64Mb RAM, you could try something else.

Martin


 
Reply With Quote
 
Glenn
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 02:41 PM

Aosmosis, IPcop is a very good Linux based router http://www.ipcop.org/


Glenn


 
Reply With Quote
 
Bernard Peek
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 02:52 PM
In message <41d2c9ef$0$891$(E-Mail Removed)>, Aosmosis
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes


>Does anyone know what linux distro would be the best for a complete novice?


You can either choose a general-purpose Linux distro or a dedicated
firewall/proxy system. I would recommend the latter, Smoothwall or
IPCop.


--
Bernard Peek
London, UK. DBA, Manager, Trainer & Author. Will work for money.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Martin Slaney
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 02:57 PM
Aosmosis wrote:

> "Martin Slaney" <(E-Mail Removed)_SPAMpipex.com> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>>Aosmosis wrote:
>>
>>>After doing a clearout, I noticed I had enough bits to make a router PC.


>>
>> ^^^
>>Errr ... the above implies you meant to ask a question ...
>>
>>--
>>..
>>
>>I am not a marketing target ... I am a free man.

>
>
> LOL well noticed,
>
> Does anyone know what linux distro would be the best for a complete novice?


I use Smoothwall (www.smoothwall.org) - which is a highly stripped-down
dedicated NAT router/gateway/firewall solution .... has worked very well
for me for 2.5 years .... someone else mentioned IPCop - a similar thing.

But these are not really what you want if you also want to "futz around"
with Linux.

Generally people use SFF-type boxes for this - cuts down on power
consumption, noise etc.

There are some advantages over yer 60 quid router/firewall/switch
gizmo's, but not really much price advantage if you take into account
power consumption etc.

--
...

I am not a marketing target ... I am a free man.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Treeherder
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 07:33 PM
Bernard Peek <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in news:(E-Mail Removed):

> You can either choose a general-purpose Linux distro or a dedicated
> firewall/proxy system. I would recommend the latter, Smoothwall or
> IPCop.


If you go for a dedicated distro (which I would recommend), you could also
take a peek at these two:
<http://www.clarkconnect.com/info/index.html>
<http://contribs.org/modules/news/>

--
treeherder.co.uk (marcus)

Any reference to trees or their herding is purely coincidental.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Lurch
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-29-2004, 11:08 PM
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:57:09 +0000, Martin Slaney
<(E-Mail Removed)_SPAMpipex.com> strung together this:

>I use Smoothwall (www.smoothwall.org) - which is a highly stripped-down
>dedicated NAT router/gateway/firewall solution .... has worked very well
>for me for 2.5 years .... someone else mentioned IPCop - a similar thing.
>

Just to be different, I'd recommend IPCop. I've been running it for 12
months without a hitch.

>But these are not really what you want if you also want to "futz around"
>with Linux.
>

That's what I thought when I looked into it originally, but there is a
certain amount of CLI stuff you can do that isn't configurable from
the web interface.

I use the IPCop box as the firewall and also run Linux on another
machine for "futzing" around on it. I wouldn't recommend using your
firewall as a practice machine.
--

SJW
Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject
 
Reply With Quote
 
Dorothy Bradbury
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-30-2004, 08:02 PM
> PII 400Mhz,
> Gigabyte motherboard,
> 64Mb RAM PC66
> 2x 10/100 LAN (3com and CNET)
> 1Mb ISA card, or 2mb PCI


Base on easiest driver support.

> Hard drives that I found spare:
> CDROM drive 16x


Unplug after installing the O/S?

> 250Mb, 1GB, 4.3Gb, 8GB


1) PC will probably draw less than 60W
---- PSU efficiency will be only ~60%
---- however your loadavg will be tiny
---- a 150W SFF PSU may have better efficiency
2) You could sell the components & buy a router
---- might actually work out better re running cost

Firewall's (re NAT Router) are best kept "minimalist"
in terms of 1 service running re risks, vulnerability.
That said, Linux is easier to maintain re security.

3) even 250MB is overkill
---- floppy, USB drive or Flash IDE are sufficient

The board might allow underclocking re power saved.
Some Linux distros & router/firewall fit on a 3.5" floppy.
--
Dorothy Bradbury
www.dorothybradbury.co.uk for quiet Panaflo fans


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Building to Building WLAN Questions drftnc240jm Wireless Networks 0 02-24-2011 08:37 PM
Suggestions for a short building-to-building hop Cloy Wireless Internet 19 08-18-2007 11:09 PM
Building a wireless router... nEiL Linux Networking 3 01-13-2007 03:59 AM
Building to Building (interoffice) access Merrill P. L. Worthington Wireless Internet 5 06-12-2006 08:09 AM
DWL-900ap+ repeating a router in another building templar Wireless Internet 1 02-11-2004 05:37 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11