BT Suck

Just been told by BT my line is to far from the exchange to get BB, when it
shouldnt be. They must wrap my line in circles!

Been told I will not and probably never will get ASDL.
They have cancelled my order with Pipex. Their pissy checker has told me for
the last 5mths I could get BB.

I'm totally hacked off. BT say there is no point in me trying to order a
second line......basically I've had it.

Decal

"Decal" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bmujr1$ttj$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Just been told by BT my line is to far from the exchange to get BB, when
it
> shouldnt be. They must wrap my line in circles!
>
> Been told I will not and probably never will get ASDL.
> They have cancelled my order with Pipex. Their pissy checker has told me
for
> the last 5mths I could get BB.

Ask Pipex for the actual line results - that might help you decide if trying
for a 2nd line is useful

The checkers are inaccurate I'm afraid until an actual test is carried out..

Regards
Sunil

nice one m8 will phone Pipex tomorrow

Decal

"Sunil Sood" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bmukrj$qk3f5$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Decal" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:bmujr1$ttj$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Just been told by BT my line is to far from the exchange to get BB, when
> it
> > shouldnt be. They must wrap my line in circles!
> >
> > Been told I will not and probably never will get ASDL.
> > They have cancelled my order with Pipex. Their pissy checker has told me
> for
> > the last 5mths I could get BB.
>
> Ask Pipex for the actual line results - that might help you decide if
trying
> for a 2nd line is useful
>
> The checkers are inaccurate I'm afraid until an actual test is carried
out..
>
> Regards
> Sunil
>
>

"Decal" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bmujr1$ttj$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Just been told by BT my line is to far from the exchange to get BB, when
it
> shouldnt be. They must wrap my line in circles!
>
> Been told I will not and probably never will get ASDL.
> They have cancelled my order with Pipex. Their pissy checker has told me
for
> the last 5mths I could get BB.
>
> I'm totally hacked off. BT say there is no point in me trying to order a
> second line......basically I've had it.

OK, so it's BT's fault that you chose to live where you do then?

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:56:18 +0000 (UTC), "Maximus"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>OK, so it's BT's fault that you chose to live where you do then?
I really get sick of reading totally unfounded complaints about BT
BT are in business to make a profit they are NOT a charitable
organization has some people seem to think they are .
Grant .

"Grant Crozier" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:56:18 +0000 (UTC), "Maximus"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >OK, so it's BT's fault that you chose to live where you do then?
> I really get sick of reading totally unfounded complaints about BT
> BT are in business to make a profit they are NOT a charitable
> organization has some people seem to think they are .

BT are still a near monopoly, in some realms of the telecommunications
industry, and as such, should provide a service to the masses, not
just to what gives them most profit.

On 19/10/03 8:47 pm, in article
JUBkb.6124$(E-Mail Removed), "Gavin Gillespie"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
> "Grant Crozier" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:56:18 +0000 (UTC), "Maximus"
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> OK, so it's BT's fault that you chose to live where you do then?
>> I really get sick of reading totally unfounded complaints about BT
>> BT are in business to make a profit they are NOT a charitable
>> organization has some people seem to think they are .
>
> BT are still a near monopoly, in some realms of the telecommunications
> industry, and as such, should provide a service to the masses, not
> just to what gives them most profit.

Sorry, what planet were you from again ?

I think that what you would like them to be - not what they are in this
world !

Sitting in an ivory tower, Gavin Gillespie wrote:

> BT are still a near monopoly, in some realms of the telecommunications
> industry, and as such, should provide a service to the masses, not just to
> what gives them most profit.

That would be true if BT were still Post Office Telephones and the Post
Office wasn't a private company, but alas privatisation means that they
need to make money.

--
Dylan Parry
http://www.webpageworkshop.co.uk - FREE Web tutorials and references
Now playing: Beethoven - Symphony No. 8 in F major, Op. 92

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:53:37 +0100, Dylan Parry
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>That would be true if BT were still Post Office Telephones and the Post
>Office wasn't a private company,
But if it wasn't making a profit back those days the exchequer just
handed them a good few thousand of OUR money to keep them going
now BT's customers have to bale them out if needed not every tax payer
in the country .
>but alas privatization means that they need to make money
And its time everything was privatized then we could all pay less tax
Ah but I forgot we have all got Mr Brown son to provide for now has
the big Scotch twit been round to the PO to collect his family
allowance yet !! .
Grant .

Ohh so you'd be well fookin chuffed if they cut your ASDL access cause it
wasnt making enough.......can u remember life on 56k....shit eh, well some
of us are still living it.

BT are a bunch of lamers, they give out different reasons everytime I
phone.2 doors away from me can get it I cant and they cant/wont explain why.
Customer service sucks.

rant over
Decal


"Grant Crozier" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 18:56:18 +0000 (UTC), "Maximus"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >OK, so it's BT's fault that you chose to live where you do then?
> I really get sick of reading totally unfounded complaints about BT
> BT are in business to make a profit they are NOT a charitable
> organization has some people seem to think they are .
> Grant .