"Klunk" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:485294e7$0$2489$(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:34:07 +0100, Graham. passed an empty day by
> writing:
>
>> "Klunk" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:48522f64$0$10638$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Friday the 13th - I awake to find my telephone line and broadband down.
>>> After a 4 mobile call there is a fault in the exchange (I'd pretty much
>>> established that anyway).
>>>
>>> Why? Was it overload? Rats? Sheer strain? Nope. A BT engineer working
>>> overnight on overtime, managed to burn the insulation off pair as he
>>> soldered the tags above - looping it out.
>>>
>>> You know, when I start to think that I am a bit harsh to BT engineers,
>>> I am reminded just why I feel the way I do.
>>
>> What stands out to me in your post is BTs honesty in telling you what
>> happened.
>> I take it this is one off event?
>> Haven't you ever made an error in your chosen trade or profession?
>>
>> Incidentally, I do not work for BT.
>
> Yes, I've made plenty of mistakes - for example leaving a different sock
> on in my above follow up. I tend to learn from them and try not to repeat
> them.
>
> No, it's not a one off event. It's about the fourth time in 12 months.
> Always in the exchange, always as a result of something someone has done.
> If I made a mistake and the fault was mine, I would be charged £99 + VAT.
> If this was a level playing field I would be able to charge them for
> their mistake.
>
critcher said............................
absolutely correct, you should be able to charge for their incompetence.
|