BT server status page on btoFAQ: true or bonkers

http://www.btofaq.net/articles/sstatus1.html

Its been like this for weeks! Are the servers really this bad? Or is the
btoFAQ's monitoring system pants?

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:21:17 -0000, "Alien Zord"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>http://www.btofaq.net/articles/sstatus1.html
>
>Its been like this for weeks! Are the servers really this bad? Or is the
>btoFAQ's monitoring system pants?
>

I think it has been like that since he left BTO. I've pinged several
of the servers, and they all work just fine. I can't use the web news
server on that site either.

d

_____________________________

http://www.pearce.uk.com

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:21:17 -0000, "Alien Zord"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>http://www.btofaq.net/articles/sstatus1.html
>
>Its been like this for weeks! Are the servers really this bad? Or is the
>btoFAQ's monitoring system pants?
>

Last I heard was that BTO were blocking Mike's polls.

At the moment, UK-Bug is trialing its own server status - which you
can see a brief snipet of what it might look like @
http://snurl.com/37r6 .

Far from covering just BTO, we're currently looking at Nildram,
Plusnet and Bulldog with more to follow soon.
--
Andy Jenkins
UK Broadband Usergroup : http://www.uk-bug.net

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:43:00 +0000, Don Pearce <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:21:17 -0000, "Alien Zord"
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>http://www.btofaq.net/articles/sstatus1.html
>>
>>Its been like this for weeks! Are the servers really this bad? Or is the
>>btoFAQ's monitoring system pants?
>>
>
>I think it has been like that since he left BTO. I've pinged several
>of the servers, and they all work just fine. I can't use the web news
>server on that site either.

Not as "nice" as what Mike had running by my own admission, but
http://snurl.com/2kdx currently syncs with BTO, Nildram & Plusnet
newsgroups,
--
Andy Jenkins
UK Broadband Usergroup : http://www.uk-bug.net

Andy Jenkins wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:21:17 -0000, "Alien Zord"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.btofaq.net/articles/sstatus1.html
>>
>>Its been like this for weeks! Are the servers really this bad? Or is the
>>btoFAQ's monitoring system pants?
>>
>
>
> Last I heard was that BTO were blocking Mike's polls.
>
> At the moment, UK-Bug is trialing its own server status - which you
> can see a brief snipet of what it might look like @
> http://snurl.com/37r6 .
>
> Far from covering just BTO, we're currently looking at Nildram,
> Plusnet and Bulldog with more to follow soon.
> --
> Andy Jenkins
> UK Broadband Usergroup : http://www.uk-bug.net

We're doing something similar but DNS servers aren't monitored. I
suspect that'll change when we get some time, though. Some example
stats at http://snurl.com/37s6.

alex

"Alien Zord" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bqftag$21b4ol$(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.btofaq.net/articles/sstatus1.html
> Its been like this for weeks! Are the servers really this bad? Or is the
> btoFAQ's monitoring system pants?

http://home.btconnect.com/sadenterprises/
UK Bug have something in the works as well, but I'm sure Andy will follow
up.

> > http://www.btofaq.net/articles/sstatus1.html
> > Its been like this for weeks! Are the servers really this bad? Or is the
> > btoFAQ's monitoring system pants?

LOL looks just like I remember it :-)

--
Please add "[newsgroup]" in the subject of any personal replies via email
* old email address "btiruseless" abandoned due to worm-generated spam *
--- My new email address has "ngspamtrap" & @btinternet.com in it ;-) ---

"Andy Jenkins" <andy_nfTORIES@btopenworld..com> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Not as "nice" as what Mike had running by my own admission, but
> http://snurl.com/2kdx currently syncs with BTO, Nildram & Plusnet
> newsgroups,
>
>
Yes, its good to have access to other 'ISP specific' NGs.
BTW, there's an 'h' in synchronisation.

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:46:44 -0000, "Alien Zord"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>"Andy Jenkins" <andy_nfTORIES@btopenworld..com> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed).. .
>> Not as "nice" as what Mike had running by my own admission, but
>> http://snurl.com/2kdx currently syncs with BTO, Nildram & Plusnet
>> newsgroups,
>>
>>
>Yes, its good to have access to other 'ISP specific' NGs.
>BTW, there's an 'h' in synchronisation.
>
There are three a's in Aardvark, but I'm not sure of the relevance of
this either.

d

_____________________________

http://www.pearce.uk.com

"Don Pearce" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:46:44 -0000, "Alien Zord"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >"Andy Jenkins" <andy_nfTORIES@btopenworld..com> wrote in message
> >news:(E-Mail Removed).. .
> >> Not as "nice" as what Mike had running by my own admission, but
> >> http://snurl.com/2kdx currently syncs with BTO, Nildram & Plusnet
> >> newsgroups,
> >>
> >>
> >Yes, its good to have access to other 'ISP specific' NGs.
> >BTW, there's an 'h' in synchronisation.
> >
> There are three a's in Aardvark, but I'm not sure of the relevance of
> this either.
>
>
Wrong glasses again?
http://www.uk-bug.net/index.php?name...file=index&c=2
http://www.uk-bug.net/index.php?name...1636bcf7200aa9
http://www.uk-bug.net/index.php?name...1636bcf7200aa9
http://www.uk-bug.net/index.php?name...1636bcf7200aa9
....
....
....
....
....
....
....