On 04/10/2011 05:30, James Noble wrote:
> In message <-(E-Mail Removed)>,
> Wibble <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>
>> "Stephen Wolstenholme" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>> message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Does the outage at one of BT major exchanges only
>>> course trouble for
>>> BT users?
>>>
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15154020
>>>
>>> Steve
>>
>>
>> Do you mean "only course trouble" or cause?
>>
>>
> I think you are wasting your time! Even people born
> and educated in this country in the last 30 years seem
> unable to speak or write English properly anymore.
>
That's a bit harsh. I have found the odd homophone
creep in to my own typing, and of course! the
spell-checker accepts it. It's not lack of
understanding the word. I "hear" it in my head
without thinking about how it looks written down. I
guess my brain just supplies the "first match", not
looking at the context.
If you go back 30 years, you'd find plenty of adults
with poor literacy skills. There were lots of jobs
that didn't require it. That's not the case nowadays.
Literacy demands are much higher. We seem to
communicate more by writing and less by speech.
Incidentally, my spell-checker has flagged "anymore".
If you were being ironic, nice one!
> Education, or lack thereof, is probably the biggest
> factor. A recent item on the BBC suggested that the
> habit of saying, for example, "1800s" instead of "19th
> century" in so many programs, was because a lot of
> people didn't understand how to work out which century
> was being discussed.
I find that awkward, too, but for most of my life, we
didn't need to say "19th". We just said "last". Now,
when kids say "that's so last century", they mean,
well, people like us.