>
> "Exasperated" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com...
>
> Ouch, I think I'll avoid ordering a new line - that's another £130
> plus the line rental for a minimum of 12 months and getting broadband
> moved to a new line which may or may have the issues the current one
> does. That's a lot of expense and 'kerfuffle' to prove a point.
No No No !!!!
The whole point would be to have a completely new ADSL service on the new
line!!! You would then be able to compare like with like. It might also be
instructive to us a different ISP - somebody equally trustworthy - I hear
good things of Andrews & Arnold, see
http://www.aaisp.net.uk/ - you might
even ring them first and ask whether they are up to the challenge.
And seriously, if this is for work, then the cost of a second line and
another ISP subscription is surely good value compared with the
inconvenience you have endured so far ...
> Miss Thomas there may well be getting a 'disgusted of Tunbridge Wells'
> letter though because the cop-out excuse of having no minimum quality
> standards with broadband is BS and I'm sure must be against Trading
> Standards' 'fit for purpose' description for goods or services.
Do let us know how you get on with our Keris. Perhaps a personal visit? ...
--
Graham J