On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:57:38 +0100, "kraftee"
<kraftee:b&e-cottee.me.uk> wrote:
>
>"R. Mark Clayton" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> "Andrew Benham" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:is31ss$spc$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>I noticed a few weeks ago that a new FTTC cabinet had appeared next to
>>> an old BT cabinet on the main road about 1km from home.
>>> [ Alas this is on a different exchange from my line at home, although
>>> it feeds the next road ].
>>> Plugging phone numbers I know are fed from this cabinet into the Infinity
>>> checker tells me that there are no plans to rollout Infinity to that
>>> area in the next 6 months. But BT's map shows that the exchange (LNENF)
>>> is ready for orders (IIRC it was one of the exchanges in the first
>>> phase).
>>>
>>> Is this just BT's database being out of date, or is there a huge time
>>> gap between installing an FTTC cabinet and it being ready for action ?
>>
>> They have to lay fibre from the exchange to the new cabinet, wire back
>> from the old one, obtain a power supply (slow) and then connect it all up
>> and test it. Yep it takes months.
>
>And that's where they install the correct number of MUX (apparently they
>have to be able to offer the product to 80% of the exchange users)
Have more info about the 80% figure?
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
(")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking some articles
posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
everyone you will need use a different method of posting.
|