Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > BT ignoring pings on their routers of late?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

BT ignoring pings on their routers of late?

 
 
ale.cx
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-10-2007, 09:44 PM
Customer of ours has a WAN that interacts with BT's at various levels,
including IPClear and a Central with bunch of IPStreams hanging off
it. We've noticed within the last month that BT seem to have
reconfigured their kit so it doesn't respond to pings. We used to ping
the PE router on the IPClear circuit, in order to check the circuit is
up, and auto-failover to one of the others if not. The engineers I've
spoken to at IPClear support say I should be able to ping the PE
router, and can't give an explanation as to why not ["I can ping your
loopback address from the VRF" was one response. For a moment, I
thought I'd slipped into a parallel universe, where NTL Broadband
support was moonlighting for BT]. As for the Central, it's a BT-
provisioned Cisco 36xx, that has also stopped responding to pings, in
the same week. Anyone else noticed this?

alexd

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Paul Cupis
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-10-2007, 11:33 PM
ale.cx wrote:
> Customer of ours has a WAN that interacts with BT's at various levels,
> including IPClear and a Central with bunch of IPStreams hanging off
> it. We've noticed within the last month that BT seem to have
> reconfigured their kit so it doesn't respond to pings. We used to ping
> the PE router on the IPClear circuit, in order to check the circuit is
> up, and auto-failover to one of the others if not. The engineers I've
> spoken to at IPClear support say I should be able to ping the PE
> router, and can't give an explanation as to why not ["I can ping your
> loopback address from the VRF" was one response. For a moment, I
> thought I'd slipped into a parallel universe, where NTL Broadband
> support was moonlighting for BT]. As for the Central, it's a BT-
> provisioned Cisco 36xx, that has also stopped responding to pings, in
> the same week. Anyone else noticed this?


Yes, it is in response to recently publicised Cisco vulnerabilities.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ping second NIC over wire(ignoring loopback) Giro Linux Networking 3 12-13-2011 01:37 AM
Is Ignoring Michael (TKIP) a mad/bad idea? Adrian C Home Networking 8 06-21-2010 05:04 PM
UK phone spammer ignoring TPS, something.info. Spin Dryer Broadband 12 03-17-2009 07:11 PM
Linux ignoring SYN packets ErMejo Linux Networking 7 05-22-2008 08:45 AM
RRAS Internal interface using APIPA address, ignoring both DHCP an Jacques Assert Windows Networking 5 05-05-2008 02:59 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11