BT$ gets angry if prodded by customers

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/14/bt_bulldog/

"When I speak to colleagues in Bulldog [about the performance of Openreach],
they say: 'We won't tell you because you tell the press and then people in
BT get angry.'"


There you go, how to get BT$ angry...
...Just tell the press what you know, and you can
control BT$ staff at the end of your fingertip.

Some day, they might actually do so some work.

On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:57:15 GMT, [7] said :-

>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/14/bt_bulldog/
>
>"When I speak to colleagues in Bulldog [about the performance of Openreach],
>they say: 'We won't tell you because you tell the press and then people in
>BT get angry.'"
>
>
>There you go, how to get BT$ angry...
>..Just tell the press what you know, and you can
>control BT$ staff at the end of your fingertip.
>
>Some day, they might actually do so some work.
>
>

This post by the "7" troll just shows what a buffoon he is.

The register are well known for their inaccurate reporting and
resistance to publish corrections - yet "7" believes them.

If this article _is_ accurate, then "7" doesn't even consider the
appalling systems of C&W and their clear lack of internal
communications.


"7" is still posting via Telewest/Blueyonder - pretty much the UK's
most clueless company with regard their spamming/trojaned users.

Spin Dryer wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:57:15 GMT, [7] said :-
>
>>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/14/bt_bulldog/
>>
>>"When I speak to colleagues in Bulldog [about the performance of
>>Openreach], they say: 'We won't tell you because you tell the press and
>>then people in BT get angry.'"
>>
>>
>>There you go, how to get BT$ angry...
>>..Just tell the press what you know, and you can
>>control BT$ staff at the end of your fingertip.
>>
>>Some day, they might actually do so some work.
>>
>>
>
> This post by the "7" troll just shows what a buffoon he is.

Unlike you of course.