On 13/6/04 2:54 pm, in article
(E-Mail Removed),
"Francis John Armstrong" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 14:04:59 +0100, Graham in Melton
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> That¹s why its called a trial - try different lengths and see what happens !
>
> No it isn't. It's called "The Emails...". Either the distances
> have been removed or they weren't presented in the emails to the
> MKBAG. Either way we are given no information other than that
> previously denied numbers appear to have obtained success in varying
> degrees.
BT are not inviting the public a part in making a decision for them are they
? Sure people are taking part in the trial but as you acknowledge later on
in your reply, the final decision is made by BT.
>
> Clearly it's being collated by BT, it would have been useful
> to have it with the apocryphal information presented at the webs site.
To whom ? Not to BT as all it does is start a storm of protest from those
outside the limit complaining is should be extended .. There is no
advantage to BT discussing publicly in detail what they are hoping to
achieve.
> No big deal, BT will make a decision based on the commercial
> realities, I'm simply somewhat eager to determine what the operational
> parameters are showing from the test group, your mileage may vary.
Your acknowledgement of the commercial realities is gratifying, but rare !
I'm not sure why you think knowledge of the operational parameters would be
useful to the community at large.... Even if you are doing research on the
topic BT are within their rights to withhold their IPR in terms of network
design.
What is your interest in the operational parameters as you put it ?
Another barrack room lawyer looking to complain ?