On 22 Jun 2005 11:57:25 -0700,
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>tonight, BT support at first tried to tell me that my problems were due
>to the fact that my router is set-up to not respond to pings. I
>pointed out that responding to pings is a security risk and why on
>earth would that cause a proble, since it's worked fine for 18 months.
>they then said the firewall on my mac had to be turned off. I refused,
>and asked to speak to someone else.
pings are not a security risk, if you want people to diagnose network
issues then responding to pings is useful - that is why they exist
after all.
>the someone else went through my physical set-up and said I need to try
>a doubler rather than a splitter on the line where my Sky box is
>connected. what's the difference, and why is this problem
>intermittent? when the sky box was first installed I had problems with
>interference but that was solved by buying a decent ferrite core filter
>for that socket.
Sky boxes make calls, so intermittency might be it doing just that ?
Language like doublers and splitters isn't helpful, especially as some
people call microfilters splitters.
>last bit of advice from BT was to connect the router directly to the
>rj11 socket inside the master socket and see if it works then. problem
>is the bb is fine right now and only seems to drop when I really can't
>be bothered to call BT, ie 10pm at night.
the test socket is a BT socket behind the master faceplate, plug in
there and see if the symptoms go away. If they do then the solution is
easier to identify.
http://www.clarity.it/telecoms/adsl_faceplate.htm#part3
With what are you connecting, and does it give you line statistics. If
you know what the SNR/Noise margin is and monitor it you may see why
the connection drops.
http://www.pipexsupport.com/bbs/viewtopic.php?t=3408
Phil
--
Tiscali - dialup speeds at Broadband prices, see
http://bbs.adslguide.org.uk/postlist...&Board=tiscali
AOL - the unlimited ISP of choice for heavy downloaders.