How disappointing. I'm an IT professional with some networking and security
knowledge. I haven't been reading the tech rags lately, and wireless is new
to me. I haven't noticed any stories about wireless security in the
mainstream media. However, in the few days I've been researching and
implementing a home wireless network, I do find the added security holes to
be worrisome. I'm seriously considering taking it all back (router, nic)
and along the baseboards of our new apartment. Seems to me security is
enough of a pain without opening new holes. I've always seen this kind of
thing as benefit vs. risk. I'm not sure the benefits outweigh the risks in
this case, from what I'm learning.
-Jeremy
"Selar Rao" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:rOE4b.76532$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Disabling SSID broadcast does very little for enhancing wireless security.
> Every AP transmits its SSID in the clear in the beacon frames. I would not
> lose much sleep over whether or not SSID is being broadcast.
>
> Disabling SSID broadcast and "128" bit WEP are more in the nature of
> marketing gimmicks, designed to combat the fears generated in the consumer
> by the widespread publicity given to Wireless security (or the lack
thereof)
>
>
> "yirm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:biuqt4$mic$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > In my Netgear WGR614 router/AP, I've unchecked the "Allow Boradcast of
> Name
> > (SSID)" box. However, when I take a Winsows XP Pro laptop with a
wireless
> > NIC and go to the Wireless Network Connection Properties, the SSID pops
> > right up as an available network. I thought that disabling broadcast of
> > SSID was supposed to defeat this!?
> >
> > TIA.
> >
> > -Jeremy
> >
> >
>
>
|