David Bradley <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>Terry Eden:
>>>Extension box -> Microfilter -> ADSL modem
>>That's WRONG, ADSL modem doesn't need microfilter !
The filter is needed where POTS CPE (eg, a telephone) is to be connected.
The OP may have a filter there with both a telephone and an ADSL modem
connected.
>>Only telephone's, faxes etc. need filters to block the ADSL signal which
>>causes high pitch noise,
>>(but some phones do work without microfilter).
> You have opened a can of worms here. A filter DOES NOT block an ADSL
> signal to the POTS device, it is the other way round.
My reading of BT SIN 346, and other documentation referencing ITU-T G992.1
is that the filter does indeed attenuate the high frequency DSL signal
towards the POTS equipment.
That's why the POTS (voice) circuit from the combined Master Socket /
Filter is only suitable for voice - the DSL signal has been filtered.
"A low pass filter prevents high frequency data traffic from entering the
POTS terminal equipment. It provides sufficient attenuation of the local
upstream ADSL signals to eliminate interference to the POTS equipment from
the subscribers own modem. This could be harmful to the POTS equipment as
it frequently contains many non-linear devices which can act as
demodulators when presented with high frequency signals, resulting in
voice band noise." (
http://www.isomatic.co.uk/Splitters-Filters.htm)
<snip>
> NOW, anyone diasgree with any of these statements?
Yes.
Please provide references that support your position.
I haven't obtained the text of ITU-T G992.1, but BT SIN 346 & other
documents which reference G992.1 appear to support my understanding that
the filters are low-pass filters which pass only voice-band signals to the
POTS CPE.
d.