blueyonder SPAMS its customers (again)

blueyonder users have received SPAM in their email boxes from their own
ISP 'blueyonder'
This happened before, and users asked to be removed from this SPAM list,
they were reassured that if they choose to opt out, then their request
wud be honoured, ie: no SPAM from blueyonder, and third party agents
actin on blueyonders behalf.

This has proven to be not so...
Users have once again received SPAM.
This has bin met with angry complaints from their customers,

Ironically, the SPAM managed to get through the Anti SPAM filtering
system blueyonder use, 'Spamhaus' This system is designed to block this
kind of SPAM from reachin their customers mailboxes in the first place,
and when introduced was met with complaints that it was blockin wanted
'SPAM' such as Yahoogroups'
It has bin suggested that this particular SPAM from blueyonder has bin
manually allowed to get through this Anti SPAM system 'Double Standards'

Users have logged an official complaint to blueyonder.
(I just hope it isn't met with last years reponse "click on the
un-subscribe link on the bottom of the email, and you will be removed
from the list)

)

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:02:29 -0000, "Gøñzølã" <T o p @ S e c r e t . c
o m> wrote:

>blueyonder users have received SPAM

Why do you capitalise spam?

Gøñzølã wrote:
> blueyonder users have received SPAM in their email boxes from their own
> ISP 'blueyonder'

Have they?

> This happened before, and users asked to be removed from this SPAM list,

Did they?

> they were reassured that if they choose to opt out, then their request
> wud be honoured, ie: no SPAM from blueyonder, and third party agents
> actin on blueyonders behalf.
>
> This has proven to be not so...

Has it not?

> Users have once again received SPAM.
> This has bin met with angry complaints from their customers,

Has it?

> Ironically, the SPAM managed to get through the Anti SPAM filtering
> system blueyonder use, 'Spamhaus'

Did it?

> This system is designed to block this
> kind of SPAM from reachin their customers mailboxes in the first place,

Is it?

> and when introduced was met with complaints that it was blockin wanted
> 'SPAM' such as Yahoogroups'

Was it?

> It has bin suggested that this particular SPAM from blueyonder has bin
> manually allowed to get through this Anti SPAM system 'Double Standards'

Has it?

> Users have logged an official complaint to blueyonder.

Have they?

> (I just hope it isn't met with last years reponse "click on the
> un-subscribe link on the bottom of the email, and you will be removed
> from the list)

Do you?

Who gives a shit?

You spout off with no proof or evidence of anything you suggest. I
think you're a troll, and not a very good one at that.

--
The Caretaker .........

"Richard Sobey" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:02:29 -0000, "Gøñzølã" <T o p @ S e c r e t . c
> o m> wrote:
>
> >blueyonder users have received SPAM
>
> Why do you capitalise spam?

To differentiate between SPAM and spam.
SPAM is bad...
I don't want you thinkin they're throwin that spam stuff at them.

"The Caretaker" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:I9JDf.74166$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Gøñzølã wrote:
> > blueyonder users have received SPAM in their email boxes from their
own
> > ISP 'blueyonder'
>
> Have they?

Yes.

> > This happened before, and users asked to be removed from this SPAM
list,
>
> Did they?

Yes they did.

> > they were reassured that if they choose to opt out, then their
request
> > wud be honoured, ie: no SPAM from blueyonder, and third party agents
> > actin on blueyonders behalf.
> >
> > This has proven to be not so...
>
> Has it not?

No it hasn't

> > Users have once again received SPAM.
> > This has bin met with angry complaints from their customers,
>
> Has it?

Yes it has.

> > Ironically, the SPAM managed to get through the Anti SPAM filtering
> > system blueyonder use, 'Spamhaus'
>
> Did it?

Yes it did.

> > This system is designed to block this
> > kind of SPAM from reachin their customers mailboxes in the first
place,
>
> Is it?

Yes it is.

> > and when introduced was met with complaints that it was blockin
wanted
> > 'SPAM' such as Yahoogroups'
>
> Was it?

Yes it was.

> > It has bin suggested that this particular SPAM from blueyonder has
bin
> > manually allowed to get through this Anti SPAM system 'Double
Standards'
>
> Has it?

Yes.

> > Users have logged an official complaint to blueyonder.
>
> Have they?

Yes they have.

> > (I just hope it isn't met with last years reponse "click on the
> > un-subscribe link on the bottom of the email, and you will be
removed
> > from the list)
>
> Do you?

Yes I do.

> Who gives a shit?

You?

> You spout off with no proof or evidence of anything you suggest. I
> think you're a troll, and not a very good one at that.

I'm not in the habit of tellin lies.
That wud be wrong of me...
Have you seen any denial from AB in regards to my posts?

You ask too many questions, mate )

Gøñzølã wrote:
> "The Caretaker" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message

>>You spout off with no proof or evidence of anything you suggest. I
>>think you're a troll, and not a very good one at that.
>
>
> I'm not in the habit of tellin lies.
> That wud be wrong of me...
> Have you seen any denial from AB in regards to my posts?

I wouldn't know who AB is, but you appear to be speaking shit and have
not shown any proof of what you say, why should anyone ('cept maybe
anally retentive shits like me) respond to unproven and possibly
unfounded allegations from an apparently illiterate fuckwit?

> You ask too many questions, mate )

I'm not your mate.


--
The Caretaker .........

The Caretaker wrote:

> I wouldn't know who AB is

AB would be Alex Brown. He makes the tea in the Blueyonder office in
return for "favours".

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:58:16 GMT, The Caretaker
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Gøñzølã wrote:
>> blueyonder users have received SPAM in their email boxes from their own
>> ISP 'blueyonder'
>
>Have they?
>
>> This happened before, and users asked to be removed from this SPAM list,
>
>Did they?
>
>> they were reassured that if they choose to opt out, then their request
>> wud be honoured, ie: no SPAM from blueyonder, and third party agents
>> actin on blueyonders behalf.
>>
>> This has proven to be not so...
>
>Has it not?
>
>> Users have once again received SPAM.
>> This has bin met with angry complaints from their customers,
>
>Has it?
>
>> Ironically, the SPAM managed to get through the Anti SPAM filtering
>> system blueyonder use, 'Spamhaus'
>
>Did it?
>
>> This system is designed to block this
>> kind of SPAM from reachin their customers mailboxes in the first place,
>
>Is it?
>
>> and when introduced was met with complaints that it was blockin wanted
>> 'SPAM' such as Yahoogroups'
>
>Was it?
>
>> It has bin suggested that this particular SPAM from blueyonder has bin
>> manually allowed to get through this Anti SPAM system 'Double Standards'
>
>Has it?
>
>> Users have logged an official complaint to blueyonder.
>
>Have they?
>
>> (I just hope it isn't met with last years reponse "click on the
>> un-subscribe link on the bottom of the email, and you will be removed
>> from the list)
>
>Do you?
>
>Who gives a shit?
>
>You spout off with no proof or evidence of anything you suggest. I
>think you're a troll, and not a very good one at that.

Thats a lot of rhetorical questioning !
Jasper

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Gøñzølã <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:-

>
>"Richard Sobey" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed).. .
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:02:29 -0000, "Gøñzølã" <T o p @ S e c r e t . c
>> o m> wrote:
>>
>> >blueyonder users have received SPAM
>>
>> Why do you capitalise spam?
>
>To differentiate between SPAM and spam.
>SPAM is bad...

You don't like the meat-like product[0] that Hormel make? I wouldn't
worry about it. Quite a few people don't like it, myself included.

>I don't want you thinkin they're throwin that spam stuff at them.

I don't think that anyone would like either SPAM(TM), especially if it's
still in the tins, or spam[1] thrown at them.


[0] Otherwise known as SPAM which is, incidentally, the registered
trademark of Hormel.

[1] Spam, or spam, is the crap that gets dumped into email boxes.

Regards,
David Bolt

--
Member of Team Acorn checking nodes at 50 Mnodes/s: http://www.distributed.net/
AMD1800 1Gb WinXP/SUSE 9.3 | AMD2400 256Mb SuSE 9.0 | A3010 4Mb RISCOS 3.11
AMD2400(32) 768Mb SUSE 10.0 | RPC600 129Mb RISCOS 3.6 | Falcon 14Mb TOS 4.02
AMD2600(64) 512Mb SUSE 10.0 | A4000 4Mb RISCOS 3.11 | STE 4Mb TOS 1.62

"David Bolt" <blacklist-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:4WlMnoP4g+(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Gøñzølã <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:-
>
> >
> >"Richard Sobey" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >news:(E-Mail Removed).. .
> >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:02:29 -0000, "Gøñzølã" <T o p @ S e c r e t
.. c
> >> o m> wrote:
> >>
> >> >blueyonder users have received SPAM
> >>
> >> Why do you capitalise spam?
> >
> >To differentiate between SPAM and spam.
> >SPAM is bad...
>
> You don't like the meat-like product[0] that Hormel make? I wouldn't
> worry about it. Quite a few people don't like it, myself included.
>
> >I don't want you thinkin they're throwin that spam stuff at them.
>
> I don't think that anyone would like either SPAM(TM), especially if
it's
> still in the tins, or spam[1] thrown at them.
>
>
> [0] Otherwise known as SPAM which is, incidentally, the registered
> trademark of Hormel.
>
> [1] Spam, or spam, is the crap that gets dumped into email boxes.

Yes.