"(E-Mail Removed)" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com...
> My experience with proxy servers is limited. But my experience has
> been 1000 user environment..once implemented it actually performed
> poorly. In addition asking a user for an additional proxy password
> was difficult and produced excessive calls to our helpdesk.
ISA Server uses Intergrated Authentication. There is no "prompt". It goes
by what they logged into their workstation as.
> I believe we could block it via firewall...I'm actually not sure why we
> didn't do it this way in the first place.
ISA is a "firewall". "Firewall" is a generic term. Both a Proxy Server or
a NAT Server can be a "firewall". They are just two competing technologies
to accomplish the same task. What most people call "firewalls" as simply
NAT Servers and are not as capable as a product such as ISA Server. NAT
Devices cannot use Integrated Authentication with Domain Level Accounts.
Even MS's own NAT Server (Windows Server with RRAS) cannot do Intergrated
Authentication,...I believe it is a limitation of NAT.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com