In article <4496601d$0$1219$(E-Mail Removed)>, It's Me says...
>
> "ABC" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:e75isq$n8p$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >
> > "David Bradley" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> On 18 Jun 2006 22:29:33 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> >>
> >>>This message is for anyone who is still foolish enough to be tempted by
> >>>TalkTalk's "Broadband Forever" package.
> >>
> >> <snip the rest except for this statement:>
> >>
> >> "They often try to fob you off with nonsense pseudo
> >> technical excuses (I know its nonsense because I'm an IT
> >> professional)"
> >>
>
>
> IT professional ? I don't think you are or you would not even have given any
> thought of signing up to TalkTalk.
>
> I am IT amateur and even I know you get what you pay for, in the case of
> TalkTalk broadband is free.
>
>
>
seems like quite a few people had the same first impression that I did.
If the OP is "an IT professional" then I wouldn't employ him. The Talk
Talk scheme has so many potential problems associated with it (namely
how do you fund a functional broadband offering at zero cost to the
consumer?) that someone who can't spot that isn't much of an IT person
in my eyes.
You get what you pay for. If you pay nothing, you can't expect Zen
standards of service or competence. I certainly wouldn't trust my IT
requirements to someone who takes gambles on their own services, and
ends up losing, or does not think that quality is worth paying for.