"Dr Teeth" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I was just thinking how wonderful life was, when "Tim \(remove
> obvious\)" <(E-Mail Removed)> opened his gob and
> said:
>
>>Ok, so suggest a better solution...
>
> You will probably get away with an antenna outside the cabinet,
From what you go on to say, I take it you mean a high gain antenna. As in my
earlier post, this is not an option if you need all-round coverage.
> but you should also use a high gain antenna on the receiver too.
Assuming you mean "wireless client" rather than "receiver", this is not
practical if the client moves (eg a laptop). However, it is ideal if the
client is fixed.
I am not sure if you think otherwise, but considering a single pair of
transceivers, it makes no difference where you add aerial gain (at least in
theory).
> Thought of cable? Not being funny, but personally, for me, wireless
> would have to be a very last resort.
It is nice for anything portable, but otherwise I totally agree. The way the
OP described things, I got the impression he had a mixed network already.
Alex
|