What is best protocol for low bandwidth wireless networks

What is best protocol which gives more speed then TCP for low bandwidth
wireless
networks.

Example: for internet though GPRS which has bandwidth ( 3 to 50 kbps)

On 27 Jul 2006 23:00:32 -0700, "sandeep" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
<(E-Mail Removed) .com>:

>What is best protocol which gives more speed then TCP for low bandwidth
>wireless
>networks.
>
> Example: for internet though GPRS which has bandwidth ( 3 to 50 kbps)

For what purpose?

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

John Navas wrote:
> On 27 Jul 2006 23:00:32 -0700, "sandeep" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> <(E-Mail Removed) .com>:
>
> >What is best protocol which gives more speed then TCP for low bandwidth
> >wireless
> >networks.
> >
> > Example: for internet though GPRS which has bandwidth ( 3 to 50 kbps)
>
> For what purpose?
>
> --
> Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
> John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

Sorry for late reply, we are developing http proxy servers. One proxy
server is with internet service providers (ISP) and another proxy
server is in mobiles or laptop, the data transmitting between them is
through wireless. So which protocol is good for fast and reliable then
TCP

On 3 Aug 2006 04:21:36 -0700, "sandeep" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
<(E-Mail Removed) .com>:

>John Navas wrote:
>> On 27 Jul 2006 23:00:32 -0700, "sandeep" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>> <(E-Mail Removed) .com>:
>>
>> >What is best protocol which gives more speed then TCP for low bandwidth
>> >wireless
>> >networks.
>> >
>> > Example: for internet though GPRS which has bandwidth ( 3 to 50 kbps)
>>
>> For what purpose?

>Sorry for late reply, we are developing http proxy servers. One proxy
>server is with internet service providers (ISP) and another proxy
>server is in mobiles or laptop, the data transmitting between them is
>through wireless. So which protocol is good for fast and reliable then
>TCP

TCP is reliable, but handshaking causes delays over high latency
connections (e.g., GPRS). UDP avoids delays, but has no built-in
checking, so your software would have to provide its own.

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

John Navas wrote:
> On 3 Aug 2006 04:21:36 -0700, "sandeep" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> <(E-Mail Removed) .com>:
>
> >John Navas wrote:
> >> On 27 Jul 2006 23:00:32 -0700, "sandeep" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> >> <(E-Mail Removed) .com>:
> >>
> >> >What is best protocol which gives more speed then TCP for low bandwidth
> >> >wireless
> >> >networks.
> >> >
> >> > Example: for internet though GPRS which has bandwidth ( 3 to 50 kbps)
> >>
> >> For what purpose?
>
> >Sorry for late reply, we are developing http proxy servers. One proxy
> >server is with internet service providers (ISP) and another proxy
> >server is in mobiles or laptop, the data transmitting between them is
> >through wireless. So which protocol is good for fast and reliable then
> >TCP
>
> TCP is reliable, but handshaking causes delays over high latency
> connections (e.g., GPRS). UDP avoids delays, but has no built-in
> checking, so your software would have to provide its own.
>
> --
> Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
> John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
> Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
> Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>


So any other protocol which is combination of udp and tcp futures
which works faster for low speed wireless networks

On 3 Aug 2006 22:11:14 -0700, "sandeep" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
<(E-Mail Removed) .com>:

>John Navas wrote:

>> TCP is reliable, but handshaking causes delays over high latency
>> connections (e.g., GPRS). UDP avoids delays, but has no built-in
>> checking, so your software would have to provide its own.

>So any other protocol which is combination of udp and tcp futures
>which works faster for low speed wireless networks

See Transport Layer at
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite#Layers_in_the_Internet_pro tocol_suite_stack>
(or <http://tinyurl.com/38dlb>)

--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://Wireless.wikia.com>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.wikia.com/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>