(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> Sounds pretty impressive. I think I will get it. Never heard of it before
> and it is in none of my stores.
>
> To get a wider range does it need special adapters ("super G" or "extreme")
> or should I get a wider range with plain G adapters?
>
> Thank you Jack.
>
> Jeff
>
> Jack (MVP-Networking). wrote:
>> Hi
>> Zyxel 550 -
>> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...pk=zyxel%2b550
>> ----------
>> Disclaimer: I have No connection with any of the Hardware providers,
>> or and, the vendors that I mentioned above.
>> Jack (MS, MVP-Networking)
>>
>>
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> I am having range problems with my home router (Trendnet 432BRP B1)
>>> when WPA is implemented. WPA seems to greatly reduce the effective
>>> range. So I am considering replacing the router if another router
>>> will give me better range with WPA.
>>>
>>> Is that a reasonable option or would a Range Expander (WRE54G) be a
>>> better option? My PCs have G adapters.
>>>
>>> Jeff
>
>
In general, products that basically are wireless-G but claim to have
better range or throughput use proprietary modifications to the IEEE
802.11g standard. As such, they generally require the use of products
in the same make and model line in order to achieve the claimed
benefits. Usually, using such products with standard wireless-G adapter
will get you standard wireless-G performance. However, ZyXEL claims
otherwise:
"When the X-550 connects with non XtremeMIMO products, it extends the
range and raises the throughput."
I assume those enhancements would be less than what you would get if you
used the X-550 with ZyXEL's own XTremeMIMO adapters. I don't know what
would happen if you took a chance and used adapters from Linksys,
D-Link, or someone else that had "MIMO" or "RangeBoost" or a similar
enhancement.
--
Lem -- MS-MVP
To the moon and back with 2K words of RAM and 36K words of ROM.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer
http://history.nasa.gov/afj/compessay.htm