On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:10:54 GMT, Beretta <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 06:19:01 GMT, "Jonathan Eales" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Thanks Guys, for your suggestions but the problem is fixed. If you use the
>>supplied stand the speed is capped at 11Mbps, yet if you push the adapter
>>directly into the USB socket the reported speed immediately jumps to 54Mbps.
>>Go figure! Tried this on both computers and it works.
>>Jonathan
>Sounds to me like the "stand" may be using a USB 1.1 rated cable.
>Try it with a USB 2 rated cable
The only real differnces between USB 1.1 and 2.0 cables are
shielding and tolerances.
The problem is that many of the cheapo 1.1 cables are not even close
to meeting the USB 1.1 standard, much less meeting 2.0. The usual
problem is with the tiny, highly flexible, cables found on digital
cameras, media readers, and other single device cables. They don't
suck much power, so the cable manufactory skimps on conductor size.
Since the brilliant designers of USB elected to supply 5.0VDC, demand
that the load work on no less than 5.0VDC, and totally ignore the
voltage drop, a smaller guage power cable becomes critical. This may
be what's happening here. The base unit, and the radio both require
power from the computah. Wireless devices are NOT low power devices.
If the cable drop is excessive, one or these two devices may "fail" in
some way. Try a short "fat" cable and see if it helps.
This may be of interest:
http://www.everythingusb.com/forums/...p?threadid=809
I don't exactly agree with everything, but it gives the general idea.
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558