kevin bailey wrote:
>>>you're either astroturfing for BT or - what, something - i dunno.
>>
>>Not at all, You are just, if you excuse my french, making a cunt of
>>yourself here. With your attitude and posts there is no way you really
>>could be considered professional or competent in any way. The childish
>>drival about BT is the stuff that kids do. The minute you express a view
>>in the manner that you did you just look like a low end consumer playing
>>at comms.
>>
>
>
>
> ah right. the bad language might be a giveaway.
>
> ladies and gentlemen - what we have here is the same tactics used by MS on
> advocacy newsgroups - they were using vile language and accusations of
> homosexuality and communist sympathies on NG's to try to stir thing's up or
> waste people's time.
>
> weird psychology of some sort.
>
> i'll answer the points - but then i'm afraid this is getting a bit boring
> and repetitve - so i'll leave then.
>
> checkout the killfile function.
>
>
>>>you're trying to defend BT for some reason - but you're going against the
>>>tide.
>>
>>I don't think so. They own the largest network in the Country and have
>>millions of satisfied customers. In fact, with a customer base and
>>serive area as large as theirs it's a suprise that you don't see many
>>more complaints. Especially when you consider NTL, for example, to be
>>much smaller and managing to get slated by Which magazine as one of the
>>poorest suppliers of broadband in the UK, have less than half as many
>>customers and even have a spoof website called 'NTHELL' as they are so
>>awful. Then add to this that BT Wholesale provide BB/DSL for hundreds of
>>different service providers via a multitude of systems with a multitude
>>of hardware. Something no other operator has to do. Just because kevin
>>the gerbal has a problem that he is not clever enough to sort out
>>through lack of links and communication with the RIGHT PART of BT kind
>>of highlights your inexperience, or lack of persistance.
>>
>
>
> puff for BT - then gratuitous insult.
>
>
>>>so a router got blown - over a week later BT have been unable to fix the
>>>problem - a bloke in a van replaced the router but we can't get BT to set
>>>it up properly.
>>
>>Did you ask the 'bloke in the van' to stick a console lead in it and set
>>it up or did you assume it would work the way you wanted out of the
>>packet?
>>
>
>
> he was from BT!
>
> and since BT supply the router and service i thought he'd set it up - i'm
> not supposed to touch the BT supplied router which was supplied by BT.
>
>
>>>meanwhile a business can not receive any email which is now being
>>>bounced. all because of this...
>>
>>And you as their advisor did not build any backup or redundancy into
>>their setup and let them criple themselves when it went tits up? What
>>kind of a cunt are you!
>>
>
>
> see - the gratuitous swearing again?
>
> as it was i did advise them to have cable installed six months ago as part
> of a strategic document. they chose not to - but they have agreed to go
> ahead now.
>
>
>
>>>BT are incapable of setting up a router to the same settings that was on
>>>the
>>>original router. they even have remote access to the device.
>>
>>And you are also incapable of doing it. Can you not log in yourself and
>>achieve what you want via the browser interface or with command line
>>instructions or are you 'incapable' of supporting it yourself? If so,
>>what are you being paid for?
>>
>
>
> was advised that interfering with the BT router could have caused BT to
> complain and possibly charge.
>
> also, i did not have the admin login - could have tried a factory reset but
> would have lost the connection settings.
>
> refer to the other post i made about finding the manual for the siemens
> router.
>
>
>>>and i'm serious about the race - it could well be that telewest could
>>>install BB from scratch before the useless monopoly called BT can set up
>>>a router.
>>
>>It may be, Just remember that telewest have been snapped up by NTL.
>>Remember, NTHELL, Which magazines worst ISP ever. Was that another of
>>your personal recomendations? Muppet.
>
>
> i don't have any experience of telewest's service - but they are the only
> one's with cable in the business park so no choice really - anyway, two
> connections will be better than one. once telewest is working i've been
> asked to look into replacing BT.
>
>
>>Go an get read the idiots guide to
>>telcos before you fuck another businesses comms up.
>
>
> actually - i got it fixed - i followed another recommendation on this NG.
>
> i called up BTW on a number used mainly by ISP's - found out what had
> happened before i said that there was a mix up and actually i was a
> customer. but by that time the ball was rolling again. service was
> restored 4 hours later.
>
>
> here's the snippet
>
> <quote>
>
>>call BT up and they say they have to get BT wholesale to call back.
>>
>>they don't call back
>
>
> Yep, you've got a bad case of 'BT' there.
>
>
>>does anyone know how to contact BT wholesale - cos the helpdesk won't give
>>out a number?
>
>
> 08000850643 - but they won't speak to you. There's a snotty little message
> saying it's for the exclusive use of service providers. You could pretend
> you are 'Kevin' from 'BT Connect', and ask for an update on a fault on
> <circuit phone number>. The people they employ to man that number are
> unusually retarded - even by BT employee standards - so you may just sneak
> through the net. Good luck to you, and do tell us how you get on!
> </quote>
>
>
> i have to say that the woman was very helpful - it took a while but we got
> the job done!
>
> cheers - it's been fun.
>
> kev
All of which basically underlines the fact you do not know what you are
doing. Fuck off back to Macdonalds kid
<plonk>
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
