On Sun, 23 May 2004 14:41:35 +0200, obsidian
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> hmmm, doesn't seem to make sense...
> the E side of the MDF remains unchanged (since the number is not
> changing),
> so there is no (technical) reason to remove the jumper from the DSLAM
> (filter) - then all that needs to be done is to rejumper the D side,
> surely?
>
> enlightenment welcome...
>
Hi,
I wish the move ADSL process was this simple, not only would it make it
simpler for us as a support team but it would certainly improve the
experience for our customers (and all other ISP's too) as retaining the
same phone number will normally result in a week's downtime.
Looking at it from BT's point of view they don't necessarily know that the
new line can support ADSL. BT rid run a short trial on moving both the
PSTN service and ADSL at the same time, unfortunately this wasn't very
successful and we are still left with the cease and reprovide process.
Each ISP is in regular contact with BT Wholesale about how things can be
improved and you will find that for most ISP's this is one of the top
issues. Things will be moving in the background, which will likely result
in a new improved trial, but it may take time.
To Trev, I would recommend contacting Pipex and asking them if the cease
has been completed, if they see that it has then they may need to contact
BT Wholesale to get that cease closed off and the ADSL flag completely
removed from the line. One of the problems with BT's various databases is
that they don't all always update in real time. BT Retail will be able to
see what services you currently subscribe to, but if the cease has been
properly closed by wholesale at the old property this won't show up to
them, it will only show up on the online checkers.
--
Regards,
| Dave Tomlinson Broadband Solutions For
| Technical Support for Home & Business
| PlusNet Technologies Ltd. @
http://www.plus.net
+ ----- My Referrals - It pays to recommend PlusNet -----