"farcry80" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:BFC9B78C-0624-4EC3-B812-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Phillip,
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I do wish I can get it away from this setup but the problem is that the
> DHCP
> entries have to mirror an external static DNS database that is not AD
> integrated and does not support DDNS. I would prefer to use leases where
> the
> entries remain fresh but I can't think of a way to keep the exisiting good
> DHCP entries static so they correspond to the external DNS database (which
> have to be bulk loaded every few months manually).
I don't see how DHCP has anything to do with that at all.
If the goal is to just have the LAN Clients be able to resolve the Names
listed in the external DNS Server then do a Zone Transfer with the external
DNS Database. Then your internal AD/DNS would remain "aware" and have a
"copy" of the contents of the external DNS. Then the external DNS changes
its contents the AD/DNS would pickup the change the next time the Zone
Transfer updates.
Then:
> (which have to be bulk loaded every few months manually).
That sounds like a disaster all by itself. Someone needs to revisit why any
of that is done the way it is done to start with.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------