mike wrote:
> Hi K
>
> We have corresponded before over BT type line stuff and this time I
> need your superior advice.
Don't I'll start blushing
>
> We help a mate who has BT (not very)broadband. Unfortunately he is
> lucky to ever get a 1Meg connection and sometimes 700K - as was his
> neighbour before he moved.
> A recent BT guy who visited to investigate, said it was the router
> and he managed to get a new one sent but no better
> This is confirmed by Samknows on his phone number and phone numbers
> of nearby neighbours and actually asking some neighbours what they
> get. Strangely all along the street (therefore on the same main
> cable) everyone else gets about 4 - 5Meg.
First supposition, you are incorrect in your thinking at this point as
there are a few places in my patch where streets have been partially
swapped to a newer scheme but not all the properties where put thru.
I can even take you to some where all the new cabling is in place &
yet no one has been swung over onto it, but I can understand your
reasoning.
> I have checked the street cable to the BT outside and, even though
> it is an oldish plastic 4pair, the whites seem to be the correct
> pairing so I don't think it is split pair on that bit.
> Unfortunately the pair into the house disappears as an old grey
> 'dropwire' and re-appears at the NTE as a new 4pair so there must
> be a join somewhere.
??????Confusion the external wiring is old 4pr so where does the
dropwire 3 come into place(old grey dropwire), but you are correct in
assuming that somewhere along the length there has got to be another
block.
> I might do a check from the block (won't tell on me will you?).
It's what I would do in your stead...
>
> However if no better, is there any way to get a suitably qualified
> Openreach person to check for split pairs (strange co-incidence that
> next door is bad) at least back to the nearest cab?
> Recently Openreach had a purge on joints and checked all down the
> street but I doubt they checked for splits.
Fraid not, the only time (over 5-6 years) I've known a PTO to do
testing on pairs (on an ADSL fault) is one which went all the way up
the ladder to the board. I'm not saying it isn't done, it's rarely
done
>
> I have to say 'qualified' as I was recently out helping to sort a
> problem with a newish guy (one leg dis making the BB work but of
> course not the PSTN) - chatting at the cab (about joining the BT
> Outside Broadcast Group - who I have worked with a lot) and I had
> to explain line theory and capacitance/inductance/freq response TO
> HIM and the problems one can get with split pairs.
Yes I know quite a few guys out there who would split a pair in order
to get 2 working wires, regardless of the future results.
>
> Any advice to 'get around the system' would be appreciated.
There isn't anything you can do other than flag it up as high as you
can in the managerial tree, even I've had to go that path recently due
to the ineptitude of the support desk. If your line is testing
electronically ok, balanced capacitance, no earth, battery or loop
conditions, there is very little you can do in order to get an
interest in your perceived problem.
(Here comes one of my rambling examples)
I have a row of shops on my patch & every shop bar one can have DSL
services, I've changed the complete routing from exchange to customer,
I've renewed over head & internal cabling, to no effect. All test say
it should (including a line loss reading), checked the ambient RF
field (on the off chance one of their machines is pumping out a signal
just at the right signal to give them grief) but nothing can be done
for them.
(that wasn't so long, was it).
>
> The guy is actually thinking of trying to sign-up with BT Vision -
> letting them sort the pairs so it may work - then trying to cancel!!
If his speed is that low (& if they check) he won't be able to
progress his order
>
> Mike
Sorry to give you hard news, but check for that block before getting
to down hearted, you never know it may be nice & green (green is bad)
it could even have been plastered into a wall, which is just as bad..
|