I'm not sure either. I haven't heard of this happening before. I know that
some poorly written third party Apps can be like this because they aren't
properly designed to run on anything above Win98, but I have never seen this
with Office and certainly not Outlook Express. Requiring Admin to install
is common, but requiring Admin to run isn't normal.
Has anything been done to these machines concerning NTFS permisions on file
& folders and registry keys?
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
"Bill" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:23b701c47021$2b5021c0$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Well, not quite sure how to diagnose "odd".
>
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >We have that on all our machines and never have to give
> them those elevated
> >privledges. The must have been something odd about your
> machines before the
> >Apps were installed.
> >
> >--
> >
> >Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> >www.wandtv.com
> >
> >"Bill" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> message
> >news:225201c46ffe$d0865f60$(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> I'm having a problem with a number of apps including
> >> Office and Outlook Express on XP domain clients. Some
> apps
> >> either require registry hacks or have to be run as local
> >> Administrator before they work and before the user can
> >> launch them under thier profile.
> >>
> >> In a number of cases, installed local apps simply won't
> >> run under the user profile. I understand the GPO
> controls
> >> many of the local permissions but I have to believe that
> >> there is some kind of formal procedure for installing
> >> these apps that avoids these problems - barring making
> all
> >> my users Power Users or local Admins. They can't all
> >> require registry hacks!!
> >>
> >
> >
> >.
> >