AP used as a "bridge"?

I'm not sure I'm using the correct terminology; I may be looking for
"node" instead of "bridge".

What I'd like to do is use an inexpensive self-contained wireless device
to allow an ethernet-equipped time and attendance terminal to access (and
be accessed by) our office network. Even though the distance is only 40',
hard-wire is impossible (economically and cosmetically).

We presently have a wireless access point by which several office
computers use the LAN. I'd like the terminal to access the LAN by the AP
we already have, rather than having to create a bridge connection with
two new wireless devices.

I've configured ONE AP in the last three years (and used a wizard), so
I'm not familiar with the features of cheap WallyWorld APs like LinkSys,
etc.

Suggestions?

Thanks,
LLoyd

Lloyd E. Sponenburgh wrote:
> I'm not sure I'm using the correct terminology; I may be looking for
> "node" instead of "bridge".
>
> What I'd like to do is use an inexpensive self-contained wireless
> device to allow an ethernet-equipped time and attendance terminal to
> access (and be accessed by) our office network. Even though the
> distance is only 40', hard-wire is impossible (economically and
> cosmetically).
>
> We presently have a wireless access point by which several office
> computers use the LAN. I'd like the terminal to access the LAN by
> the AP we already have, rather than having to create a bridge
> connection with two new wireless devices.
>
> I've configured ONE AP in the last three years (and used a wizard), so
> I'm not familiar with the features of cheap WallyWorld APs like
> LinkSys, etc.
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> LLoyd

yes - it's an Ethernet Bridge -

I use a Linksys WET11 in the family room
along with a small 5-port hub,
to link our xbox + Tivo to the Internet
via our home WiFi network.

Here's the newer version
http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satel...=9743339789B05

"ps56k" <(E-Mail Removed)> fired this volley in
news:ePnSj.3311$(E-Mail Removed) t:

> http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satel...hildpagename=U
> S%2FLayout&cid=1134692497433&pagename=Linksys%2FCo mmon%2FVisitorWrapper
> &lid=9743339789B05

Thanks,
That was perZakly what I was looking for. For us non-wireless competent
people, it looks like a simple solution.

LLoyd

Lloyd E. Sponenburgh wrote:
> "ps56k" <(E-Mail Removed)> fired this volley in
> news:ePnSj.3311$(E-Mail Removed) t:
>
>> http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satel...hildpagename=U
>> S%2FLayout&cid=1134692497433&pagename=Linksys%2FCo mmon%2FVisitorWrapper
>> &lid=9743339789B05
>
> Thanks,
> That was perZakly what I was looking for. For us non-wireless
> competent people, it looks like a simple solution.
>
> LLoyd

if this is in the middle of a factory floor,
you might grab a WiFi laptop and go stand where the table is located
to verify you have a good WiFi signal
and there is no major or continuous RF interference
such as welders, RF heater/sealers, etc -

"ps56k" <(E-Mail Removed)> fired this volley in
news:NFoSj.1115$(E-Mail Removed) :
> if this is in the middle of a factory floor,
> you might grab a WiFi laptop and go stand where the table is located
> to verify you have a good WiFi signal
> and there is no major or continuous RF interference
> such as welders, RF heater/sealers, etc -

'Tis two small buildings separated by 40' with concrete the bosses don't
want marred between, and nowhere to locate directional boring equipment.
Overhead is a no-no, too.

There are no machines except computers and an old mechanical/electrical
time clock.

I did the test your recommended before I made the post, to make sure I'd
have connectivity there.

LLoyd

Lloyd E. Sponenburgh wrote:
> "ps56k" <(E-Mail Removed)> fired this volley in
> news:NFoSj.1115$(E-Mail Removed) :
>> if this is in the middle of a factory floor,
>> you might grab a WiFi laptop and go stand where the table is located
>> to verify you have a good WiFi signal
>> and there is no major or continuous RF interference
>> such as welders, RF heater/sealers, etc -
>
> 'Tis two small buildings separated by 40' with concrete the bosses
> don't want marred between, and nowhere to locate directional boring
> equipment. Overhead is a no-no, too.
>
> There are no machines except computers and an old
> mechanical/electrical time clock.
>
> I did the test your recommended before I made the post, to make sure
> I'd have connectivity there.
>
> LLoyd

just to toss out another alternative - AC power or copper wire bridges.
We used these to extend our network out to the loading dock area
as we couldn't get a good signal thru the windows & metal roof/siding...
http://www.netgear.com/Products/Powe...ers/XE102.aspx
or a Phoneline adapter.... Ethernet over a common phoneline wiring vs AC
powerline wiring

> I did the test your recommended before I made the post, to make sure I'd
> have connectivity there.

And you did this testing during peak times it would be in use? Interference
from industrial equipment can be a show-stopper. Same issue with powerline
gadgetry.