Tx2 wrote:
> In article <BbKdnZMFFcAL8-(E-Mail Removed)>,
> (E-Mail Removed) says...
>
>> If all the 'contractual obligations' are being met with regard to the
>> service being supplied, I doubt you would have much clout or success in
>> getting it changed. unless of course some big wig, MP, or other VIP
>> happens to live in the area and can cause ripples at a high enough level.
>
> Yep, and doesn't that just suck.
>
> Mind you, I do have a County Councillor living around the corner for
> whom I've done a load of work in the past, and he's on the same
> exchange.......
>
> ;-)
Depends if your CC is that bothered about Broadband. Doubt mine
actually knows what BB is, let alone virtual paths.
One other way of looking at it is what the priorities are.
If you were not getting your contractual service, and you found the
upgrade to get it sorted was being delayed due to other non-priority
work being done first as VIPs were effected, how would you feel?
Not that it makes it right, but always worth looking from both sides.
J