Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Anyone use Windows Server instead of router ?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Anyone use Windows Server instead of router ?

 
 
Victor
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-26-2008, 03:17 AM


I have 6 AP's on my network and central netgear router serving 40
computers that are all on wireless. The system works just fine but I
was thinking of replacing the netgear router with a computer running
Windows 2003 server that has 2 fast network cards and let it handle
all of the DHCP functions. I like the server idea because it can be
easier managed than the old netgear router (FSV318) and I can add
bandwidth control.

Is anyone else doing this on there network? Looking for ideas.

Thank you,
Victor
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bill Kearney
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-26-2008, 12:11 PM
You can run DHCP (and it's integration with DNS and Active Directory)
without doing the routing on it. Just disable it on the central router and
let the w2k3 box handle it. You may need to set up DHCP forwarding on the
switch (but not if it's all on one subnet already).

The advantage to a standalone device like a router is reliability. A box
with no moving parts and not running anything else is less likely to give
you trouble over time. No software updates, no overloading based on other
tasks, etc. I'd be pretty hesitant to replace a standalone router with a
computer, regardless of OS being used. Computers generally consume more
power too.

As for bandwidth control you might want to start with monitoring first.
Start tracking which ports are using how much bandwidth. Tie that into
reports linked to DHCP lease reservations. You can often better manage
network consumption based on reporting. As in, show who's the culprit and
let management view the reports. Let the HR policies slap them around for
wasting company bandwidth. Keep the IT department out of the enforcement
loop. Just report the facts. Try this first, it's often usually more than
enough. Going to network shaping and bandwidth throttling is often a lot
more work to setup, monitor and maintain.

=Bill Kearney

 
Reply With Quote
 
Shadow
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-26-2008, 02:40 PM
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:17:44 -0700, Victor
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>
>I have 6 AP's on my network and central netgear router serving 40
>computers that are all on wireless. The system works just fine but I
>was thinking of replacing the netgear router with a computer running
>Windows 2003 server that has 2 fast network cards and let it handle
>all of the DHCP functions. I like the server idea because it can be
>easier managed than the old netgear router (FSV318) and I can add
>bandwidth control.
>
>Is anyone else doing this on their network? Looking for ideas.
>
>Thank you,
>Victor

It would be very expensive. Thoughts about linux ? I believe
any recent dist will do this for free.
[]'s
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows server as a router or NAT Barbie Windows Networking 1 11-28-2005 06:58 PM
Windows 2003 server causes router to crash =?Utf-8?B?R3JpemVsbGk=?= Windows Networking 14 02-28-2005 05:02 PM
WIndows server 2003 as router =?Utf-8?B?S2Vubnk=?= Windows Networking 7 09-14-2004 04:40 PM
VPN Connection between Windows 2003 server and a VPN router Jack Tan Windows Networking 3 08-26-2004 12:15 AM
Windows Server vs router as DHCP server Gerald Roston Windows Networking 4 03-05-2004 05:29 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11