Anyone know about DNS??

Hi All,

I'm going to ask a favor. I need some help possibly debugging my DNS
setup.

I run a web/mail server with multiple domains. The problem I have is
that sometimes people cannot contact my server. Other times it seems
to take more than 45 seconds for a page to draw. The results really
have no pattern. So, I am thinking that maybe I have something set up
wrong.

I know next to nothing about Linux configuration.

So, I was hoping that someone might help me out by suggesting which
config files need to be looked at and looking at them.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

Arthur

Most of Usenet readers detest spammers.
Reposting a message ( news:(E-Mail Removed) om )
_literally_identically_ is definitely a spam.
Multiposting is even worse spam;
crosspost should be used in Usenet to extend request audience.

Also, some Usenet readers don't like Google-Groupped weblusers.
Use your favorite Google for seeking answers, but keep out of Usenet!

--
qq~~~~\ [ úá IP âåú ãåîúõòù ] [ Read Usenet in the proper place ]
/ /\ \ [ FAQ you ] € http://www.comtv.ru/~av95/chainik.html
\ /_/ /
\____/ Linux console notes http://www.comtv.ru/~av95/linux/console/

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
Innocenti Maresin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Also, some Usenet readers don't like Google-Groupped weblusers.

That's the first time I've heard this kind of nonsense.

On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 13:25:22 +1300, Lawrence D¹Oliveiro wrote:

> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> Innocenti Maresin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Also, some Usenet readers don't like Google-Groupped weblusers.
>
> That's the first time I've heard this kind of nonsense.

Hopefully, he meant it in the people rather than the software sense. It is
indeed true many people killfile articles produced from Google groups.

--
BOFH Excuse #331:

those damn raccoons!

On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 13:25:22 +1300, Lawrence D¹Oliveiro wrote:

> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> Innocenti Maresin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Also, some Usenet readers don't like Google-Groupped weblusers.
>
> That's the first time I've heard this kind of nonsense.

Well, given the amount of misplaces spew I've seen from Google, it
wouldn't surprise me.

--
Phoenix

I'm sad to see that Core 2 was unable to get the Cisco AiroNet 350
wireless card working... However, here is my fix... based on a
notebook (not laptop) configuration with an embeded 10/100 ethernet
interface running Fedora Core 2 from a fresh install:

# As root...
mv /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc3.d/S24pcmcia /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc3.d/S09pcmcia
# Note: I still don't understand why pcmcia is started after network
# after years of RedHat. This is not new, but I never brought
# this question to the net... If someone can explain this,
# please do (this is not a malicious question, just one of
# curiosity...).
iwconfig eth1 essid "<your ssid>"
# Note: If your ssid is "fedora core 2", enter the following:
# iwconfig eth1 essid "fedora core 2"
iwconfig eth1 key "My key which is not linksys"
# Note: If you key is "worldpeace", enter the following:
# iwconfig eth1 worldpeace
# Note: Note the lack of a "space" in the syntax. I'm not sure
# if a double quote with a space will work, but I know the above
# does work...
ifconfig eth1 <your IP addres and netmask>
# Note: If your IP address and netmask is 192.168.255.123 and
255.255.255.0,
# enther the following:
# ifconfig eth1 192.168.255.123 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add default gw 192.168.255.1
# Note: If your default gateway is 192.168.255.1, enter:
# route add default gw 192.168.255.1

This config was able to set my network to rock. If anyone can confirm
this works for you, please post. Thanks.

> Has anyone been able to get a Cisco Aironet 350 wireless PCI adapter
> working with kernel 2.6? My problem seems to be that the adapter
> isn't recognized by the system, so don't think it's a driver issue.
> Saw where someone said that Hotplug needs to be enabled in the kernel
> - checked mine & it is. I'm using firmware version 4.25.30, so this
> should not be an issue. Have tried upgrading RH 9.0 to Fedora core 2
> and clean install of Fedora core 2. Both ways - the card is not
> recognized. Have tried Cisco driver and airo driver from Sourceforge
> site, but it doesn't really seem to be a driver issue. Adapter works
> fine with RH 9.0. Any ideas would be much appreciated.

Lawrence D¹Oliveiro wrote:
> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> Innocenti Maresin <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>Also, some Usenet readers don't like Google-Groupped weblusers.
>
> That's the first time I've heard this kind of nonsense.

No, that's most definitely true. I know a lot of people score down
posts with a message-id ending with posting.google.com.

Alexander Skwar
--
If I were to walk on water, the press would say I'm only doing it
because I can't swim.
-- Bob Stanfield
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

In comp.os.linux.misc Innocenti Maresin <(E-Mail Removed)>:
> Most of Usenet readers detest spammers.
> Reposting a message ( news:(E-Mail Removed) om )
> _literally_identically_ is definitely a spam.
> Multiposting is even worse spam;
> crosspost should be used in Usenet to extend request audience.

Yup, multi-posting is quite annoying, unsure if it's worse then
spam.

He might like to scroll up a little bit, to read our frequently
posted, if there are problems understanding what all this fuzz is
about:

"A new reader? Welcome to comp.os.linux.misc, read this first if
you're new here (FAQ)"

> Also, some Usenet readers don't like Google-Groupped weblusers.

Why? Even if there is the typical google-troll we see from time
to time, if probably used, there's no problem. People might not
have nntp access, so they can use google.

> Use your favorite Google for seeking answers, but keep out of Usenet!

This is a public forum, if someone abuses it, feel free to drop
the abuse mail address a note. Google usually removes troll
accounts quite fast, up on request.

To get back OT, the first thing for the OP, get your hands on the
great DNS howto (www.tldp.org) and work through it step by step,
come back with a specific question if there are problems
remaining.

--
Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94)
mail: echo (E-Mail Removed) | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBZ5PqAkPEju3Se5QRAhbyAKDDRN0luMM8nGS28Gawkj ggH1FDZwCcCzUQ
KgXQgclI0Y2wh61kXwLLsso=
=BwG3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 07:31:55 +0000, Michael Heiming wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> In comp.os.linux.misc Innocenti Maresin <(E-Mail Removed)>:
>> Most of Usenet readers detest spammers. Reposting a message (
>> news:(E-Mail Removed) om )
>> _literally_identically_ is definitely a spam. Multiposting is even worse
>> spam;
>> crosspost should be used in Usenet to extend request audience.
>
> Yup, multi-posting is quite annoying, unsure if it's worse then spam.

You do know that spam is excessive multi-posting, right?

--
Phoenix

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

[ Followup-To -> comp.os.linux.misc ]

In comp.os.linux.misc Bernhard Kastner <(E-Mail Removed)>:
> Michael Heiming schrieb:
> > Yup, multi-posting is quite annoying, unsure if it's worse then
>> spam.

> You know, there's a differnce between posting a topic twice, and sending the
> same, unwanted mail to thousand of user?

You know that "spam is excessive multi-posting" like someone else
already pointed out?

--
Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94)
mail: echo (E-Mail Removed) | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBaErdAkPEju3Se5QRAsgTAJ4vXFWkPI7mtVFaRAm1ah XRyqmEMACgmpKV
f7KiHp/iflvCHH8ZS5GN+mQ=
=Xno1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----