Any stable wireless bridge?

Hi
I'm searching for good wiereless bridge (2.4GHz) to connect two LANs (both
about 50 computers) - distance 500 meters.
It's very important device must be stable - any hangs etc and good
performace.

Mariusz

Mariusz <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Hi
> I'm searching for good wiereless bridge (2.4GHz) to connect two LANs (both
> about 50 computers) - distance 500 meters.
> It's very important device must be stable - any hangs etc and good
> performace.

Line of sight?

Mariusz wrote:
> Hi
> I'm searching for good wiereless bridge (2.4GHz) to connect two LANs (both
> about 50 computers) - distance 500 meters.
> It's very important device must be stable - any hangs etc and good
> performace.
>
> Mariusz
>
>
I have used a couple of Linsyss WET11s for about two months. No problems
at all. However, one LAN has only 8 computers, the other only one. Since
the WET11s are only used to bridge a (physical) firewall, there is no
signal degradation.

If you want stability at 2.4Ghz, in order of Cheapest to most expensive:

SmartBridges APPO
Cisco 350 Bridges
WMux Tsunami

"Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:NaoEb.2499$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Mariusz <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> > Hi
> > I'm searching for good wiereless bridge (2.4GHz) to connect two LANs
(both
> > about 50 computers) - distance 500 meters.
> > It's very important device must be stable - any hangs etc and good
> > performace.
>
> Line of sight?

- I got a pair of Linksys WAP11 ver 1 / 1.1 off E-Bay

- Used the WAP11 hack to boost signal strength
http://www.seattlewireless.net/index.cgi/Wap11Hack

- Added some new antennas

- I have clear line of site and much shorter distances than you ;-)


"Mariusz" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:brsucq$hm8$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi
> I'm searching for good wiereless bridge (2.4GHz) to connect two LANs (both
> about 50 computers) - distance 500 meters.
> It's very important device must be stable - any hangs etc and good
> performace.
>
> Mariusz
>
>

U¿ytkownik "Ian Stirling" <(E-Mail Removed)> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
news:NaoEb.2499$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Line of sight?

Perfect clear line...

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>, (E-Mail Removed)
says...
> If you want stability at 2.4Ghz, in order of Cheapest to most expensive:
>
> SmartBridges APPO
> Cisco 350 Bridges
> WMux Tsunami
>

Cheaper and probably as good as the first one:

http://www.oslink.pl/osbridge/downlo...sheet_etsi.pdf

Leszek



--
http://www.google.com
Search before you ask.

> Cheaper and probably as good as the first one:
>
> http://www.oslink.pl/osbridge/downlo...sheet_etsi.pdf

802.11b is too slow for 100 users LAN Real speed for 802.11b is 500KB/s
div 100 users = 5KB/user
I'm searching 802.11g or faster...

--
Mariusz

"Mariusz" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:brtha0$lar$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Cheaper and probably as good as the first one:
> >
> > http://www.oslink.pl/osbridge/downlo...sheet_etsi.pdf
>
> 802.11b is too slow for 100 users LAN Real speed for 802.11b is 500KB/s
> div 100 users = 5KB/user
> I'm searching 802.11g or faster...
>

In that case go with the Tsunami (now from Proxim) as Jeremy suggested
above.