Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > Any Plusnet/Force9 customers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Any Plusnet/Force9 customers

 
 
Devs
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-15-2009, 03:29 PM
.....having trouble connecting across the pond? Would be obliged if you
could ping 70.86.92.34 and see if you get a response. I do from
everywhere but the place that needs it!. Tracert stalls in the middle of
the plusnet maze.
Cheers
--
Devs
"Punchdown Pete the old Kroner"
Un autre 4 ans!
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Devs
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-15-2009, 04:57 PM
In message <(E-Mail Removed) >, Eric Hill
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:29:08 +0000, Devs wrote:
>
>> ....having trouble connecting across the pond? Would be obliged if you
>> could ping 70.86.92.34 and see if you get a response. I do from
>> everywhere but the place that needs it!. Tracert stalls in the middle of
>> the plusnet maze.
>> Cheers

>
>
>No problem from a PlusNet user
>PING 70.86.92.34 (70.86.92.34) 56(84) bytes of data.
>64 bytes from 70.86.92.34: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=142 ms
>64 bytes from 70.86.92.34: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=140 ms
>64 bytes from 70.86.92.34: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=141 ms
>64 bytes from 70.86.92.34: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=150 ms
>64 bytes from 70.86.92.34: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=142 ms


Seems to be ok from Plusnet. They are a F9 customer. Seems as if the
trace is getting further now. Must be an IP block or something as the
trace goes further now.

Tracing route to mail.ns-jupiter.com [70.86.92.34]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms my.router [192.168.1.1]
2 58 ms 55 ms 45 ms lo0-plusnet.ptn-ag2.plus.net
[195.166.128.53]
3 47 ms 53 ms 53 ms ge0-0-0-204.ptn-gw02.plus.net
[84.92.3.93]
4 48 ms 45 ms 48 ms te2-2.pte-gw2.plus.net [212.159.1.106]
5 44 ms 46 ms 47 ms 80.239.193.141
6 43 ms 55 ms 45 ms mail.ns-jupiter.com [80.91.248.90]
7 79 ms 50 ms 45 ms mail.ns-jupiter.com [80.91.251.165]
8 44 ms 49 ms 53 ms abovenet-ic-126798-ldn-b3.c.telia.net
[213.248.1
01.106]
9 53 ms 52 ms 51 ms so-0-0-0.mpr1.lhr2.uk.above.net
[64.125.27.225]

10 133 ms 126 ms 118 ms so-0-1-0.mpr1.dca2.us.above.net
[64.125.27.57]
11 157 ms 155 ms 163 ms ge-2-0-0.mpr3.iah1.us.above.net
[64.125.25.114]

12 182 ms 151 ms 150 ms xe-1-1-0.er1.iah1.above.net
[64.125.26.222]
13 151 ms 151 ms 151 ms mail.ns-jupiter.com [209.66.99.94]
14 166 ms 176 ms 167 ms mail.ns-jupiter.com [70.87.253.53]
15 171 ms 170 ms 165 ms mail.ns-jupiter.com [70.87.253.10]
16 166 ms 166 ms 168 ms mail.ns-jupiter.com [70.85.127.106]
17 166 ms 167 ms 169 ms mail.ns-jupiter.com [70.87.254.42]
18 * * * Request timed out.
19 * * * Request timed out.
20 * * * Request timed out.
21 * * * Request timed out.
22 * * * Request timed out.
23 * * * Request timed out.
24 * * * Request timed out.
25 * * * Request timed out.
26 * * * Request timed out.
27 * * * Request timed out.
28 * * * Request timed out.
29 * * * Request timed out.
30 * * * Request timed out.

Trace complete.

--
Devs
"Punchdown Pete the old Kroner"
Un autre 4 ans!
 
Reply With Quote
 
Gamma Eridon
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-16-2009, 10:30 AM
On Jan 15, 4:29*pm, Devs <spamt...@sukmabobby.com> wrote:
> ....having trouble connecting across the pond? Would be obliged if you
> could ping 70.86.92.34 and see if you get a response. I do from
> everywhere but the place that needs it!. Tracert stalls in the middle of
> the plusnet maze.
> Cheers
> --
> Devs
> "Punchdown Pete the old Kroner"
> Un autre 4 ans!


C:\>ping 70.86.92.34

Pinging 70.86.92.34 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 70.86.92.34: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=50
Reply from 70.86.92.34: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=50
Reply from 70.86.92.34: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=50
Reply from 70.86.92.34: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 70.86.92.34:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 140ms, Maximum = 141ms, Average = 140ms

C:\>

C:\>tracert 70.86.92.34

Tracing route to mail.ns-jupiter.com [70.86.92.34]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms voyager.home [192.168.1.1]
2 35 ms 33 ms 39 ms lo0.homesurf.thn-ag1.plus.net
[195.166.128.102]

3 34 ms 33 ms 34 ms vl706.thn-gw2.plus.net [84.92.5.10]
4 35 ms 33 ms 33 ms xe-1-1-0-0.lon10.ip.tiscali.net
[213.200.78.69]

5 33 ms 64 ms 35 ms 213.200.77.234
6 145 ms 143 ms 142 ms The-
Planet.GigabitEthernet7-3.ar2.DAL2.gblx.net
[64.208.170.198]
7 143 ms 143 ms 146 ms te7-2.dsr02.dllstx3.theplanet.com
[70.87.253.26]

8 146 ms 141 ms 249 ms po32.dsr02.dllstx5.theplanet.com
[70.85.127.110]

9 147 ms 145 ms 143 ms 2e.fe.5746.static.theplanet.com
[70.87.254.46]
10 146 ms 148 ms 146 ms mail.ns-jupiter.com [70.86.92.34]

Trace complete.

C:\>

--

MESSAGE ENDS

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PlusNet plc/Force9 breach DPA Stan The Man Broadband 27 08-01-2006 04:52 PM
Force9 vs Plusnet Gareth Edmondson Broadband 6 12-05-2004 10:01 AM
Plusnet or Force9? Tom Ruben Broadband 7 05-09-2004 05:16 PM
Force9/PlusNet router - does it support uPnP? Martin Underwood Broadband 2 08-16-2003 03:57 PM
Re: Force9 / Plusnet problems Graham Murray Broadband 0 07-03-2003 09:02 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11