Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Network Hardware > Home Networking > Any FTP & Router Setup Gurus Here?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Any FTP & Router Setup Gurus Here?

 
 
Pete
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-16-2005, 09:11 PM

BBand.
Using: XP_SP1
Router: WGT624 (Netgear.)



I'm trying to setup an occasional FTP. I'm using TYP_FTP as it's
simple and all I need.

However I am going bald over this

I have given the machine a static IP in network preferences:

IN TCP\IP (net connections)
--------------------------------
IP: 192.168.1.100 (PC)
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway: 192.168.1.2 (ROUTER)
Preferred DNS server: 192.168.1.2 (ROUTER)
-------------------------------

... and in the router I have setup port forwarding:

FTP_01 - 12345 - 12345 - 192.168.1.100 TCP\UDP


The FTP program itself has very few configuration needs.

I assume the IP for passive mode means my WAN IP
address? (I haven't even started to think about opening
ports for that yet..)


I can do localhost to 192.168.1.100:12345 but can not attach to the
FTP if I try looping back to my WAN_IP:12345


GRC.com tells me the port is still stealthed.. which if the setup were
working it should not be.


Am I missing something? Are there extra things I need to do in the
router to get this to work?

Help appreciated.


Pete

Spamblocking
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Alex Fraser
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-16-2005, 10:55 PM
"Pete" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> BBand.
> Using: XP_SP1
> Router: WGT624 (Netgear.)
>
> I'm trying to setup an occasional FTP. I'm using TYP_FTP as it's
> simple and all I need.
>
> However I am going bald over this
>
> I have given the machine a static IP in network preferences:
>
> IN TCP\IP (net connections)
> --------------------------------
> IP: 192.168.1.100 (PC)
> Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
> Default Gateway: 192.168.1.2 (ROUTER)
> Preferred DNS server: 192.168.1.2 (ROUTER)
> -------------------------------
>
> .. and in the router I have setup port forwarding:
>
> FTP_01 - 12345 - 12345 - 192.168.1.100 TCP\UDP


Why port 12345? Also, you only need to forward TCP but forwarding UDP as
well won't stop it working.

> The FTP program itself has very few configuration needs.
>
> I assume the IP for passive mode means my WAN IP
> address? (I haven't even started to think about opening
> ports for that yet..)


Yes.

> I can do localhost to 192.168.1.100:12345 but can not attach to the
> FTP if I try looping back to my WAN_IP:12345


It's not usually possible to connect to a "port forwarded" server from
inside the network using the WAN IP address.

> GRC.com tells me the port is still stealthed.. which if the setup were
> working it should not be.
>
> Am I missing something? Are there extra things I need to do in the
> router to get this to work?


Something is apparently dropping the incoming connection requests. This
could be the ISP, the router (blocked by firewall or port forwarding isn't
working for some reason) or the server machine itself.

Alex


 
Reply With Quote
 
Pete
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-16-2005, 11:33 PM
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:55:20 +0100, "Alex Fraser" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>Why port 12345? Also, you only need to forward TCP but forwarding UDP as
>well won't stop it working.


No reason other than getting it up and running and not disturbing
anything else.. Was going to change it later...

>Something is apparently dropping the incoming connection requests. This
>could be the ISP, the router (blocked by firewall or port forwarding isn't
>working for some reason) or the server machine itself.


Your telling me )

My LAN has stopped working now after messing with TCP\IP also so I
have to fix that ... and it still won't work after reverting the
settings... I'm having a bad network day I think...

I'll be back later after I get my internal machines talking again

Pete
 
Reply With Quote
 
Pete
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-19-2005, 12:48 AM



Thanks Alex

I got my FTP program up and running in the end.

In the end i shouldn't have listened to any of the stuff I read on
various 'expert' sites.. It was a simple matter of opening the port
(which I did anyway) and running net start ...

I guess not all the needed wndows services were running.. It's now a
simple job for me to start disabling services again until I locate the
exact ones needed...

But basically in the end I did not have to mess with TCP\IP or
anything else..

Phew.. I almost gave up....

Cheers again.

Pete
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any VNC gurus around ? Chris Newey Linux Networking 9 05-05-2004 08:02 PM
Re: One for the IP gurus.. Alexander Clouter Linux Networking 3 04-02-2004 07:35 AM
Re: One for the IP gurus.. P Gentry Linux Networking 1 04-02-2004 07:35 AM
Re: One for the IP gurus.. Dave Carrigan Linux Networking 1 04-01-2004 07:22 PM
Any pptp gurus out there??? Steve Holdoway Linux Networking 3 10-16-2003 02:33 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11