Anonymous Call Reject

ACR is a thing I would like to have, but BT charge £3/month.

Anybody know of a PC Voicemail package that implements this?


--
Joe Soap.

Death is nature's way of telling you to slow down.

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:18 +0000, Joe Soap
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

|ACR is a thing I would like to have, but BT charge ?3/month.
|
|Anybody know of a PC Voicemail package that implements this?

You can get almost as good results by registering with
http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/ it's *Free*, and it *works*


--
Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> Google Groups is IME the *worst*
method of accessing usenet. GG subscribers would be well advised get a
newsreader, say Agent, and a newsserver, say news.individual.net. These
will allow them: to see only *new* posts, a killfile, and other goodies.

In response to what Dave Fawthrop <(E-Mail Removed)>
posted in news:(E-Mail Removed):

> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:18 +0000, Joe Soap
> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>|ACR is a thing I would like to have, but BT charge ?3/month.
>|
>|Anybody know of a PC Voicemail package that implements this?
>
> You can get almost as good results by registering with
> http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/ it's *Free*, and it *works*

I already have. And it doesn't.

--
Joe Soap.

Death is nature's way of telling you to slow down.

Thus spaketh Joe Soap:
> In response to what Dave Fawthrop
> <(E-Mail Removed)> posted in
> news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:18 +0000, Joe Soap
>> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>>
>>> ACR is a thing I would like to have, but BT charge ?3/month.
>>>
>>> Anybody know of a PC Voicemail package that implements this?
>>
>> You can get almost as good results by registering with
>> http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/ it's *Free*, and it *works*
>
> I already have. And it doesn't.

We had it for years, and as you say mostly doesn't work.

I found a whistle down the phone and deafening the sods worked the best,
now I only get maybe 1 or 2 callers a year.

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:32:40 +0000, Joe Soap
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

|In response to what Dave Fawthrop <(E-Mail Removed)>
|posted in news:(E-Mail Removed):
|
|> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:18 +0000, Joe Soap
|> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
|>
|>|ACR is a thing I would like to have, but BT charge ?3/month.
|>|
|>|Anybody know of a PC Voicemail package that implements this?
|>
|> You can get almost as good results by registering with
|> http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/ it's *Free*, and it *works*
|
|I already have. And it doesn't.

Does for me :-)
--
Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> Google Groups is IME the *worst*
method of accessing usenet. GG subscribers would be well advised get a
newsreader, say Agent, and a newsserver, say news.individual.net. These
will allow them: to see only *new* posts, a killfile, and other goodies.

In response to what Dave Fawthrop <(E-Mail Removed)>
posted in news:(E-Mail Removed):

> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:32:40 +0000, Joe Soap
> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>|In response to what Dave Fawthrop <(E-Mail Removed)>
>|posted in news:(E-Mail Removed):
>|
>|> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:18 +0000, Joe Soap
>|> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>|>
>|>|ACR is a thing I would like to have, but BT charge ?3/month.
>|>|
>|>|Anybody know of a PC Voicemail package that implements this?
>|>
>|> You can get almost as good results by registering with
>|> http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/ it's *Free*, and it *works*
>|
>|I already have. And it doesn't.
>
> Does for me :-)

Congratulations. You obviously aren't on the wankers' lists.

--
Joe Soap.

Death is nature's way of telling you to slow down.

In message <Xns98B3AB421632Btityifvbdfgvbzdfdf@127.0.0.1>, Joe Soap
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> writes
>In response to what Dave Fawthrop <(E-Mail Removed)>
>posted in news:(E-Mail Removed):
>
>> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:32:40 +0000, Joe Soap
>> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>>
>>|In response to what Dave Fawthrop <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>|posted in news:(E-Mail Removed):
>>|
>>|> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:18 +0000, Joe Soap
>>|> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>>|>
>>|>|ACR is a thing I would like to have, but BT charge ?3/month.
>>|>|
>>|>|Anybody know of a PC Voicemail package that implements this?
>>|>
>>|> You can get almost as good results by registering with
>>|> http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/ it's *Free*, and it *works*
>>|
>>|I already have. And it doesn't.
>>
>> Does for me :-)
>
>Congratulations. You obviously aren't on the wankers' lists.
>
So surely, as the OP, you should asking DF why it works for him and not
you...

--
dave @ stejonda

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:50:12 +0000, Joe Soap
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

|In response to what Dave Fawthrop <(E-Mail Removed)>
|posted in news:(E-Mail Removed):
|
|> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:32:40 +0000, Joe Soap
|> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
|>
|>|In response to what Dave Fawthrop <(E-Mail Removed)>
|>|posted in news:(E-Mail Removed):
|>|
|>|> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:05:18 +0000, Joe Soap
|>|> <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
|>|>
|>|>|ACR is a thing I would like to have, but BT charge ?3/month.
|>|>|
|>|>|Anybody know of a PC Voicemail package that implements this?
|>|>
|>|> You can get almost as good results by registering with
|>|> http://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/ it's *Free*, and it *works*
|>|
|>|I already have. And it doesn't.
|>
|> Does for me :-)
|
|Congratulations. You obviously aren't on the wankers' lists.

Anything which did/does get through got/gets a hard time.
*No* is a useful word.

--
Dave Fawthrop <dave hyphenologist co uk> Google Groups is IME the *worst*
method of accessing usenet. GG subscribers would be well advised get a
newsreader, say Agent, and a newsserver, say news.individual.net. These
will allow them: to see only *new* posts, a killfile, and other goodies.

In article <Xns98B3A84978BA5tityifvbdfgvbzdfdf@127.0.0.1>, Use-Author-
Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1] thought we might be interested in the
following...

> I already have. And it doesn't.

I already have, and it does.

How long have you been subscribed, and do you let the callers know you
are subscribed to the TPS?

--
My reply address is invalid
Please post replies to the group...

In article <5zPoh.28266$(E-Mail Removed) >,
bhx___spam@trapped___hotmail.co.uk thought we might be interested in the
following...

> We had it for years, and as you say mostly doesn't work.

Yet you only get 1 or 2 callers a year? I doubt you blowing a whistle
down the phone has had anything to do with it.

--
My reply address is invalid
Please post replies to the group...