Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > Aggregating upstream bandwidth

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Aggregating upstream bandwidth

 
 
Draxen
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-23-2003, 09:10 AM
I've been using a RedHat 7.2 box to drive my ADSL line for a couple of years
now, lovely jubbly everything's been cool.
Now I'd like to run a webserver and the 256kbps upstream on my line is
looking a little weedy. Ideally I'd like to double this up but an SDSL
package will cost four times as much as my current one.

So.....what about getting a second ADSL line installed (with a second phone
line obviously) and bonding the available bandwidth on my firewall ? I'm not
bothered about download speeds, just upstream. I suppose I could setup a DNS
round-robin but I was looking for something a bit more sophisticated.

Using linux (or anything else) could I bond two ADSL lines and get a virtual
512kbps upstream pipe ?

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Clueless
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-23-2003, 10:14 AM
"Draxen" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:3f700de8$0$11000$(E-Mail Removed)
> I've been using a RedHat 7.2 box to drive my ADSL line for a couple
> of years now, lovely jubbly everything's been cool.
> Now I'd like to run a webserver and the 256kbps upstream on my line is
> looking a little weedy. Ideally I'd like to double this up but an SDSL
> package will cost four times as much as my current one.
>
> So.....what about getting a second ADSL line installed (with a second
> phone line obviously) and bonding the available bandwidth on my
> firewall ? I'm not bothered about download speeds, just upstream. I
> suppose I could setup a DNS round-robin but I was looking for
> something a bit more sophisticated.
>
> Using linux (or anything else) could I bond two ADSL lines and get a
> virtual 512kbps upstream pipe ?



Short answer is yes, in Linux or using moderately expensive gear.
Google Groups link here http://tinyurl.com/oc2k
And I am planning to test a cheap Edimax router that looks like it might do
the job but only when I find the time.

S. Althaf


 
Reply With Quote
 
Horst Knobloch
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-23-2003, 11:28 AM
Draxen <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

[Bonding ADSL Lines]
> So.....what about getting a second ADSL line installed (with a second
> phone line obviously) and bonding the available bandwidth on my firewall
> ? I'm not bothered about download speeds, just upstream. I suppose I
> could setup a DNS round-robin but I was looking for something a bit more
> sophisticated.


You want to load-balance between interfaces, not between
servers, so DNS round-robin does not help with your network
configuration and you really need something more sophisticated.


> Using linux (or anything else) could I bond two ADSL lines and get a
> virtual 512kbps upstream pipe ?


This should be possible, see the following link:
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html


Ciao, Horst
--
»When pings go wrong (It hurts me too)« E.Clapton/E.James/P.Tscharn
 
Reply With Quote
 
Draxen
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-23-2003, 11:46 AM
"Horst Knobloch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bkpaoh$16gc$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Draxen <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> [Bonding ADSL Lines]
> > So.....what about getting a second ADSL line installed (with a second
> > phone line obviously) and bonding the available bandwidth on my firewall
> > ? I'm not bothered about download speeds, just upstream. I suppose I
> > could setup a DNS round-robin but I was looking for something a bit more
> > sophisticated.

>
> You want to load-balance between interfaces, not between
> servers, so DNS round-robin does not help with your network
> configuration and you really need something more sophisticated.


If each interface has a seperate IP address then surely a DNS round robin
would work, I'm not saying it'd be great load balancing but it should
function, shouldn't it ?

> > Using linux (or anything else) could I bond two ADSL lines and get a
> > virtual 512kbps upstream pipe ?

>
> This should be possible, see the following link:
> http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html


Thank you Horst, I think that'll do the job nicely to start with and also
give me a do-able learning curve to climb


 
Reply With Quote
 
Horst Knobloch
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-23-2003, 01:12 PM
Draxen <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> "Horst Knobloch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:bkpaoh$16gc$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Draxen <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> [Bonding ADSL Lines]
>> > So.....what about getting a second ADSL line installed (with a second
>> > phone line obviously) and bonding the available bandwidth on my
>> > firewall ? I'm not bothered about download speeds, just upstream. I
>> > suppose I could setup a DNS round-robin but I was looking for
>> > something a bit more sophisticated.

>>
>> You want to load-balance between interfaces, not between
>> servers, so DNS round-robin does not help with your network
>> configuration and you really need something more sophisticated.

>
> If each interface has a seperate IP address then surely a DNS round robin
> would work, I'm not saying it'd be great load balancing but it should
> function, shouldn't it ?


In this case you need to deploy DNAT to direct the web traffic,
coming in on both interfaces, to your server. And I originally
thought that reversing DNAT in the outgoing direction would
break in the presence of two interfaces / default routes.

However in the meantime I think this should be no problem as
long as Linux uses the two default routes in a round-robin
fashion and your provider does no reverse path filtering.


>> > Using linux (or anything else) could I bond two ADSL lines and get a
>> > virtual 512kbps upstream pipe ?

>>
>> This should be possible, see the following link:
>> http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html

>
> Thank you Horst,


You are welcome.


> I think that'll do the job nicely to start with and also
> give me a do-able learning curve to climb


Jupp. :-)


Ciao, Horst
--
»When pings go wrong (It hurts me too)« E.Clapton/E.James/P.Tscharn
 
Reply With Quote
 
UncleWobbly
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-23-2003, 04:03 PM
you'll need a second line anyway as SDSL doesn't permit voice and data at
the same time.

"Draxen" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:3f700de8$0$11000$(E-Mail Removed).. .
> I've been using a RedHat 7.2 box to drive my ADSL line for a couple of

years
> now, lovely jubbly everything's been cool.
> Now I'd like to run a webserver and the 256kbps upstream on my line is
> looking a little weedy. Ideally I'd like to double this up but an SDSL
> package will cost four times as much as my current one.
>
> So.....what about getting a second ADSL line installed (with a second

phone
> line obviously) and bonding the available bandwidth on my firewall ? I'm

not
> bothered about download speeds, just upstream. I suppose I could setup a

DNS
> round-robin but I was looking for something a bit more sophisticated.
>
> Using linux (or anything else) could I bond two ADSL lines and get a

virtual
> 512kbps upstream pipe ?
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aggregating 2 ISDN USB TA poochie2@gmail.com Linux Networking 0 06-29-2006 03:44 AM
Aggregating NICs James Windows Networking 4 06-14-2006 12:20 PM
Aggregating 2 ISP links (DSL) jetmarc@hotmail.com Linux Networking 4 05-15-2005 07:21 AM
upstream bandwidth limiting with tc & iptables Glenn Sherman Linux Networking 1 12-15-2004 12:50 PM
Aggregating upstream bandwidth Draxen Broadband 4 09-26-2003 06:00 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11