Draxen <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> "Horst Knobloch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:bkpaoh$16gc$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Draxen <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>> [Bonding ADSL Lines]
>> > So.....what about getting a second ADSL line installed (with a second
>> > phone line obviously) and bonding the available bandwidth on my
>> > firewall ? I'm not bothered about download speeds, just upstream. I
>> > suppose I could setup a DNS round-robin but I was looking for
>> > something a bit more sophisticated.
>>
>> You want to load-balance between interfaces, not between
>> servers, so DNS round-robin does not help with your network
>> configuration and you really need something more sophisticated.
>
> If each interface has a seperate IP address then surely a DNS round robin
> would work, I'm not saying it'd be great load balancing but it should
> function, shouldn't it ?
In this case you need to deploy DNAT to direct the web traffic,
coming in on both interfaces, to your server. And I originally
thought that reversing DNAT in the outgoing direction would
break in the presence of two interfaces / default routes.
However in the meantime I think this should be no problem as
long as Linux uses the two default routes in a round-robin
fashion and your provider does no reverse path filtering.
>> > Using linux (or anything else) could I bond two ADSL lines and get a
>> > virtual 512kbps upstream pipe ?
>>
>> This should be possible, see the following link:
>> http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
>
> Thank you Horst,
You are welcome.
> I think that'll do the job nicely to start with and also
> give me a do-able learning curve to climb
Jupp. :-)
Ciao, Horst
--
»When pings go wrong (It hurts me too)« E.Clapton/E.James/P.Tscharn