Langholm wrote:
> Hi all. My kids are moving lots of movie files. I am therefore thinking of
> upgrading my home network speed from 100 to 1000Mbps and add a Network
> Attached Storage (NAS).
>
>
>
> My home network has currently got 4 permanently installed PC's, one router,
> one switcher, one laptop and a printer with print server :
>
>
>
> - everything runs WinXP Pro.
>
> - All network cabling with RJ-45 plugs
>
> - One 10/100 switcher.
>
> - One router with built-in 10/100 switcher and Internet DSL
> connection (NetGear RP614).
>
>
>
> I would plan to do the following:
>
>
>
> - Replace the switcher with a 10/100/1000 Mbps unit
>
> - Buy a 1000 Mbps NAS (some 200 GB)
>
> - Replace some of the network cards (some are already 1000Mbps
> capable).
>
> - Keep the router, because it connects only to 100Mbps devices or
> lower, like the printer server or the Internet connection.
>
>
>
> I have some doubts about the following things:
>
>
>
> 1.- Should I worry about the cabling? It's the same plug for a 1000Mbps
> connector, isn't it? But maybe the higher bandwidth requires higher quality
> cabling? If yes, how could I find out what cable quality I've got right now?
> I would hate the idea of having to replace my cabling.
The cable may have printed on the site if its 1000Mb Certified or cat5E
or cat6.
1000 Mbit requires the use of 4 pairs of cables (cat 5e or cat6),
although there are 4 pairs in cat5 cable only 2 pairs are used, and the
state of the unused pairs is unknown.
To be safe just replace any suspect cables.
>
> 2.- I presume the existing router will not "clash" with a 1000Mbps network
> behind it, or would it?
As long as the new switch supports the speeds needed by the router then
it should be ok. I assume the router is for connection to the Internet ?
>
> 3.- BTW, any suggestion of a low cost 1000Mbps 200GB NAS would also be
> welcome.
Personally for home use i would leave a PC on with 200Gb disks in. At
its most basic thats all a NAS is anyway.
>
>
>
> Many thanks to any friendly person sharing his/her knowledge on this.
>
>
--
To reply via email, first reverse the address below then replace the
(at) with @ and the (dot) with . moc(tod)xepip(tod)lsd(ta)spuorgswen_werdna
|