Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Adventages over Windows WZC?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Adventages over Windows WZC?

 
 
Sqwertz
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-27-2008, 04:22 AM
Are there any performance advantages to using the vendor-supplied
utilities to configure/maintain your wireless adaptor when
compared to using the Windows-XP built-in Wireless Zero utility?

Netgear and Linksys, specifically. Would the vendor config be
required to enable Super-G or SpeedBooster, for example?

-sw
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-27-2008, 04:43 AM
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:22:37 -0600, Sqwertz <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>Are there any performance advantages to using the vendor-supplied
>utilities to configure/maintain your wireless adaptor when
>compared to using the Windows-XP built-in Wireless Zero utility?


No difference. The client connection manager only provide a user
hostile, I mean user friendly, method of configuring the wireless
device. The actual performance is mostly in the hardware. (Exception:
A few wireless devices do AES encryption/decryption in software).

>Netgear and Linksys, specifically. Would the vendor config be
>required to enable Super-G or SpeedBooster, for example?


Neither. The enable or disable of advanced wireless features are all
buried in the wireless access point or wireless router configuration.
If you want Super, Turbot, Hyper, or Magic features enabled, they're
all in the access point. The client radios just follow along with
whatever the access point offers. Some client configs allow you to
disable these features for that client. Those are usually available
somewhere in the client manager, advanced proporties for the network
device, or buried in the registry settings.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558 (E-Mail Removed)
# http://802.11junk.com (E-Mail Removed)
# http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
 
Reply With Quote
 
Sqwertz
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-28-2008, 05:53 AM
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:43:59 -0800, Jeff Liebermann wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:22:37 -0600, Sqwertz <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>Are there any performance advantages to using the vendor-supplied
>>utilities to configure/maintain your wireless adaptor when
>>compared to using the Windows-XP built-in Wireless Zero utility?

>
> No difference. The client connection manager only provide a user
> hostile, I mean user friendly, method of configuring the wireless
> device. The actual performance is mostly in the hardware.


That's kinda what I figured, I just wasn't sure. I've just used
WZC on the handful of clients I've set up. Most of my setups are
simple bare-bones 802.11g adapters/router sand I just wanted to
be sure I wasn't missing out on any of the extensions.

Thanks. Again.

-sw
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-28-2008, 04:40 PM
Sqwertz <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:

>On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:43:59 -0800, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:22:37 -0600, Sqwertz <(E-Mail Removed)>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Are there any performance advantages to using the vendor-supplied
>>>utilities to configure/maintain your wireless adaptor when
>>>compared to using the Windows-XP built-in Wireless Zero utility?

>>
>> No difference. The client connection manager only provide a user
>> hostile, I mean user friendly, method of configuring the wireless
>> device. The actual performance is mostly in the hardware.


>That's kinda what I figured, I just wasn't sure. I've just used
>WZC on the handful of clients I've set up. Most of my setups are
>simple bare-bones 802.11g adapters/router sand I just wanted to
>be sure I wasn't missing out on any of the extensions.


Well, there are some "extensions" in the user client managers that are
lacking in the stock XP WZC. The most complex of the bunch is Intel
Proset:
<http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/wireless/proset/proset_software.htm>
which offers diagnostics, roaming persistance control, site survey,
Cisco Extensions, logging, QoS, and a mess of other stuff that I
actually use. It's what WZC should have been. Of course, it only
works with Intel wireless cards. Some of the manufacturers client
managers also do a credible job of adding useful features. However,
none of these features will offer anything in the way of a performance
(range or speed) improvement.

--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[networking] Online Public Chat Tomorrow: TCP/IP in Windows Server 2003 SP1 and Windows XP SP2 Deepak Bansal [MS] Windows Networking 0 06-28-2005 10:30 PM
[networking] Online Public Chat Tomorrow: TCP/IP in Windows Server 2003 SP1 and Windows XP SP2 Deepak Bansal [MS] Windows Networking 0 06-28-2005 10:29 PM
Windows 2003 Server in Windows 2000 Domain Lose Trust Relationship Faisal Sarwar Windows Networking 2 06-20-2005 04:51 AM
Windows 2000 client can't map network drive on windows server 2003 John Xie Windows Networking 1 05-31-2005 04:07 PM
windows 2003 load balancing into existing windows 2000 wlbs. urgent Combfilter Windows Networking 1 12-16-2004 04:01 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11