Pete <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> In article <Lmegi.122382$(E-Mail Removed)>,
> Jerry Peters <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>Pete <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>> [Gonna have to get a router sometime. Any recommendations? (~4 ports)
>>> Trying to decide whether it's worth getting a Wireless one, for the
>>> sake of my occasionally used old laptop or future possibilities...]
>>>
>>> -- Pete --
>>Why a router rather than just a switch or hub? If the Westell is a
>>6100 then it's also a router.
>>
> Unless I'm way off base, I don't think a hub works... I have a single
> (static) IP from my DSL supplier, and I want to share that among 3 or 4
> hosts. A simple hub won't do the address translation required, but I
> was looking, for example, at the "Belkin Wireless G" manual, and it
> provides NAT to do what I need. [Nicely written manual BTW -- has slanted
> me well in favour of that box at the moment.]
>
> Dunno the model of my Westell [can't be bothered to look at its underside (:-)]
> but it's not a router -- only one RJ45 conector. Could have paid extra
> for a combo modem/router, but I decided to leave options open for now.
>
> -- Pete --
A 6100 has a single USB and a single RJ45, believe me it's a router, I
have one in the basement connected to a port on the network hub. It
does NAT, has a modifiable firewall, and a DHCP server. Just
because it has only 1 port doesn't preclude it from being a router.
Jerry
|