"GrahamU" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news

(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:19:59 +0100, "Paul Landregan"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >
> >"PJB" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> >news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >>
> >> "GrahamU" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> >> message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> >> > Two of the three PCs here have Gb ethernet that I would
> >> like to use to
> >> > full capacity (I transfer lots of very large files). I'm
> >> also looking
> >> > to replace my current PCI ADSL setup.
> >> > Question is is there a single box that will do this?
> >>
> >> Question is, do you need it? Have you measured the
> >> throughput on your current network interfaces?
> >> I did, using large iso's for sustained throughput, but only
> >> got 70 M/bits per sec, making Gigabit networking a bit of a
> >> waste of time ;-) (at the moment, anyway)
> >> Are you max'ing out the current 100Mb/s connection?
> >>
> >> P.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >70 MBits/sec is about right for a 100 Meg connection. I have never seen
yet
> >an Ethernet run at max stated speed throughput. In the days of Hubs this
was
> >easily explained with the collisions etc. but on modern switched systems
I
> >cannot figure out why you never get the full quota of BW.
> >
> >Going on present trends a Gigabit switch and cards would attain you about
> >7-800MBit/s throughput.
> >
>
> I'm getting about 82 Mb/S... I think that counts as maxed out ;-)
> I am going from RAID 0 to RAID 0 on ICH5 (off the PCI bus).
>
> Guess I'm going to have to get 2 boxes noy one :-(
>
> GrahamU
You're not the only one looking for this Graham, I wish the manufacturers of
All In One type ADSL products would wake up to demand and produce a suitable
product. A gigabit (copper) device would be very suitable for imaging
machines etc where theres very high traffic between machines (although as
pointed out the ADSL feed itself will never require this bandwidth). I'll
keep checking the SMC website.
Paul