"Peter Tobin" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:O8$J8mo#(E-Mail Removed)...
> route add 192.168.9.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.3
The route is wrong. It also should not be on the VPN device itself. From the
perspective of the VPN device the remote VPN Network is a
"Directly-Connected-Network" and therefore there is no "route" because it is
already connected to it to begin with.
If you have some *other* routing device in your system and the clients use
it as their Default Gateway, then on *that* device you must either.....
1. Set the VPN Device as its Default Gateway
OR
2. Set a static route on this device that points to the VPN Device for that
particular VPN Network. If the VPN Device is, for example,192.168.9.5 and
the remote VPN Network is 192.168.10.x, then the route would be
"Route add -p 192.168.10.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.9.5"
On the other hand if there is no *other* routing device used by the clients
and the clients are simply using the VPN device as the Default Gateway then
there is no "route" to add to anything anywhere.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com