On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 00:35:03 GMT, RJ <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>A small business network that I'm working on is a DSL line with 5 IP
>addresses.
>
>So far, only 1 IP is being used, as the computers and print server are
>plugged into a 4 port broadband router.
>
>They want to add a few computers and maybe another print server, but the
>switch is full.
>
>An option I'm considering is connecting everybody to an 8-port switch,
>then connecting that uplink into the 4-port broadband router. My
>understanding is that DHCP on the broadband router can assign everybody
>private IP's just like before. Is this correct?
>
>Is there a bandwidth problem with having everying ultimately go through
>1 port of the 4-port broadband router?
>
>I suppose I'd have to ask the DSL company whether or not there is a
>guarantee of bandwidth for each IP address assigned to this company, or
>is it just a logical separation, and it would be shared whether the
>order was
>
>DSL modem -> 4port broadband router/switch -> 8-port switch -> all PC's
>
>OR
>
>DSL -> 8-port switch -> some PC's (use up some of the IP's)
> -> 4-port router/switch (use 1 IP) -> more PC's
>
>I like the 4-port broadband router next to the DSL modem since it gives
>us some insulation from the Internet via NAT.
>
>Any comments would be appreciated,
>Robert
>
Regarding your question about DHCP across an uplinked switch: yes, that works
fine.
And yes, that'd be the safest, and probably the easiest to manage as well, of
the two proposed configurations.
It'd be worth asking the question about bw/address of the DSL company, but
eventually someone needs to answer the question: how much external bandwidth
does your company actually use?
/daytripper
|