First a disclaimer. I'm just getting involved in setting up a wireless
home network in the near future. I also have been looking into the
potential setup for extending the range. Here is what I've found from
the web and LINKSYS:
1. The LINKSYS setup for using a second AP is to connect it to the
primary router via ethernet. Then configure the second AP to a different
channel but same SSID. I believe this is the solution you are trying to
avoid.
2. As above, but now use the "home plug'/"powerline" method to connect
the second AP to the primary router. These powerline units plug into the
wall sockets and transmit signals over the house electrical wiring. You
need a powerline unit for the router and another unit for the second AP
(check with LINKSYS for the hookups). Once again, I believe you set the
second AP to a different channel but with the same SSID. This appears to
be a viable solution for your case.
3. The "repeater" solution seems to be getting mixed reviews. Several
articles indicate that throughput drops by atleast one-half. In this
case, the repeater is set to the same channel and SSID.
4. People indicate that signal boosters for the primary router (no
second AP needed?) seem to work well.
The max thruput for the powerline stuff is suppose to be around 14mbs.
This may actually wind up being better that the repeater due to its (the
repeater) inherent operational method. PC magazine (June 30< 2003) has a
wireless article that showed that the actual 54g network setup was
obtaining around 16mbs at 40 - 60 foot distances. The repeater may cut
this in half (or more).
Again, all the above is based on information that I have gathered form
the web and from vendors - I have no actual experience.
Harvey
DirtyBird wrote:
>yes--that would be ideal, but the problem lies in running the cat 5
>down to the second access point on the first floor. Will buying a
>wireless bridge and hooking it up to the second access point--will
>that carry over the signal? I've read about the non ethernet ways
>such as the electrical outlet's--but won't those slow down a 54g
>network?
>
>
|