Of course enabling the guest account is a less than secure option. But
consider the request of "on the fly" changing from client/server to peer to
peer networking. If you don't want to enable the guest account your only
option is to create a local account for EVERY person you want accessing the
share when the server is down. This means x amount of wksts times x amount
of users that you will have to sync their local account/password with the pc
with the shares [along with their AD accouont passwds]. Then you have to
assign those users to those shares. Whew I get tired just thinking about it.
Makes enabling the guest account look pretty easy doesn't it?
There are no "global" accounts in a peer to peer network!!! There is no
server/AD authenication if the DC is down.
************************************************** *******
"So let's say we create a user called Share with a password of 123456 on the
server. You would also create a local account on the workstation you wish to
share from as Share \ 123456. Then for the logon script,
net use S: \\workstation\share 123456 /user

OMAIN\Share /savecred "
Are you suggesting creating a user account on the server and all pcs called
"share"? Looks to be just another name for "guest". AND you would put the
local password in the script??? I would consider that far more insecure than
enabling guest